News & Analysis as of

Peer Review › Title VII

Polsinelli

Physician not a Hospital “Employee” for Purpose of Title VII Action

Polsinelli on

On May 8, 2019, the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed its test to determine whether a worker qualifies as an “employee” as defined by and subject to Title VII protections. ...more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Test for Employee Status

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace on

On May 8, 2019, the Seventh Circuit reaffirmed its test for determining employee status under federal anti-discrimination laws, holding that a physician lacked standing to bring Title VII claims against the hospital at which...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Fifth Circuit Finds Employer’s Peer Review Process Does Not Constitute An Adverse Employment Action

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The Fifth Circuit recently affirmed the granting of summary judgment to an employer dismissing a Title VII race discrimination claim. In Stroy v. Gibson, an African American primary care physician employed by the Department...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Independent Medical Staff Denied Title VII Protection

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

It has not been unusual for employed physicians to seek the protection provided to independent medical staff members through the due process procedures provided by medical staff by-laws. The case of Levitin and Chicago...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide