News & Analysis as of

Policy Statement Arbitration

A&O Shearman

Financial Ombudsman Service policy statement on charging fees to claims management companies and other professional...

A&O Shearman on

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has published a policy statement on its new fee rules regarding complaints that are referred to it by certain claims management companies (CMCs) and other professional representatives...more

Littler

EEOC Rescinds Policy Statement Disfavoring Arbitration Agreements

Littler on

As part of its efforts to rescind outdated guidance on a rolling basis, the EEOC recently dispensed with a 22-year-old policy statement that disfavored mandatory arbitration agreements between employers and employees....more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

No Hate to Arbitrate? EEOC Changes Stance on Arbitration Agreements

Can you require employees to sign arbitration agreements? After more than 20 years of saying no, the EEOC has reversed its policy and says you can. Background - In 1997 the EEOC issued the Policy Statement on Mandatory...more

Snell & Wilmer

EEOC Changes Policy on Mandatory Arbitration

Snell & Wilmer on

This past week, the EEOC withdrew its 1997 policy statement regarding mandatory binding arbitration agreements. In that policy statement, the EEOC took the position that the use of mandatory binding arbitration agreements as...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

EEOC Retracts Long-standing Policy Against Binding Arbitration in Bias Cases

On Dec. 16, 2019, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rescinded its 1997 policy statement on “Mandatory Binding Arbitration of Employment Discrimination Disputes as a Condition of Employment (the 1997 Policy...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide