Episode 16: Innovations in Recruitment: How Tech is Changing How Companies Hire
Predictive Coding’s ROI Outpaces Other Processes Even As Technology Costs Rise
Technology and the Law Come Together at Raytheon—Woods Abbott
An E-Discovery Litigator’s Perspective on LegalTech New York 2013
How Corporations Are Using Technology to Manage Costs of Discovery
Information Governance Will Replace Predictive Coding As Biggest Trend in E-Discovery—Judge Peck
PART ONE: This is part one of a series on my journey to appreciating TAR. Be on the lookout for part two in the coming weeks. Recently, I (Russ Beets) began work on a complex litigation case that had millions of documents...more
Traditional document review can be one of the most variable and expensive aspects of the discovery process. The good news is that there are innumerable analytic tools available to empower attorneys to work smarter, whereby...more
Several years ago, we were told that technology-assisted review (TAR) was the wave of the future and, by now, manual attorney review would likely be a thing of the past. Although TAR has gained some traction, it is not yet...more
The main problem with discovery is the cost. In a very small number of truly bet-the-company cases (for example, where the CEO’s emails must be produced) the greater risk can be failing to do discovery perfectly. But 99 times...more
On July 13, 2016, in Dynamo Holdings Limited P’ship v. Comm’r, the U.S. Tax Court strongly defended the taxpayer’s use of computer-assisted review in a dispute with the IRS. In a 2014 decision in the same case, the Tax Court...more
A reading recap of the most well-read Electronic Discovery updates on JD Supra this month. E-discovery at the intersection of social media, BYOD, the Internet of Things, and more...more
In any document search allowing defendants’ custodians to conduct their own searches is much like allowing the fox to guard the henhouse. Even focused and disciplined custodial collections can be fraught with problems....more