News & Analysis as of

Preliminary Injunctions Breach of Contract Franchisors

Fox Rothschild LLP

Should the Litigation be in State or Federal Court?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Deciding whether to choose state or federal court can be outcome determinative. This is particularly important in deciding to remove a case from state to federal court. Some state franchise statutes clearly allow a court to...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: No Spice; No Injunction

Lewitt Hackman on

A Colorado federal court denied a franchisor’s request for preliminary injunction that would enforce a non-compete provision against a former franchisee. The franchisor of spice and tea shops known as Spice & Tea Merchants...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Extra Cheesed Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Texas denied a preliminary injunction filed by a franchisee (“EYM”) after Pizza Hut, as franchisor, terminated the franchise agreements....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC, the U.S. District of Court for the District of Arizona granted a temporary restraining order in favor of a franchisor, LeTip World Franchise LLC (“LeTip”)...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Georgia Court Finds Hooter’s Franchise Non-Compete Unreasonable in Geographic Scope

Fox Rothschild LLP on

A district court in Georgia recently granted a Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by HOA Franchising, LLC’s, the franchisor of the Hooters restaurant chain (“Hooters”), against one of its former restaurant franchisees,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Blown Dry by the Competition

Lewitt Hackman on

A Minnesota bankruptcy court granted Fantastic Sams a preliminary injunction against a former Fantastic Sams franchisee, finding the operation of four new hair salons by the former franchisee was prohibited by enforceable...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

LADR Case Notes (August 2022-October 2022) and FLJ Currents (Winter 2023)

A gym franchisor recently secured a preliminary injunction against its former franchisee prohibiting the franchisee from operating an independent gym on the same location and using the franchisor’s trade secrets. Chris...more

Lathrop GPM

New York Appellate Court Dismisses Royalties Claim Because of Franchisor’s Breach Under Preliminary Injunction

Lathrop GPM on

A state appellate court in New York recently held a franchisor was not entitled to unpaid royalty fees because of its own breach of a franchise agreement reinstated by preliminary injunction. Integrity Real Estate Consultants...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: No Repairing Delayed Filing

Lewitt Hackman on

A New Jersey federal court denied a franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction against a franchisee due to franchisor’s 11 month delay in bringing the motion. Franchisee entered into two franchise agreements with H-1 Auto...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Competing With a Non-Compete Covenant?

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction against a former franchisee of Liberty Tax Service for breaching post-termination covenants under a franchise agreement. Liberty Tax entered into franchise...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 268 (Distribution Issue)

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Periodically, The Franchise Memorandum focuses on topics primarily of interest to companies that use distributors and dealers rather than manage a business format franchise...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Bad to the Bone

Lewitt Hackman on

A group of franchisees sued OsteoStrong, a franchisor of bone density improvement centers. They claimed omissions in the FDD about bankruptcies and lawsuits, and misrepresentations of patent rights to equipment and...more

Bennett Jones LLP

A Clarified Approach to Pure Economic Loss Claims

Bennett Jones LLP on

In November 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in 1688782 Ontario Inc. v Maple Leaf Foods Inc. This is an important decision clarifying the analytical approach to the duty of care analysis in negligence...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Fitness Franchisee Exercises Poor Judgment

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Denver granted Fitness Together Franchise, LLC a preliminary injunction against the owner of three former franchisees, three former franchisee entities and three additional entities formed to operate a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Trashing the Competition

Lewitt Hackman on

In a misappropriation of trade secrets action, a franchisor sued a prospective franchisee, claiming breach of a non-disclosure agreement ("NDA") by operating a competing business. The prospective franchisee signed the NDA...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Successor Slips Out of Non-Compete

Lewitt Hackman on

A Florida federal court granted a preliminary injunction against a terminated franchisee. The court enjoined the ex-franchisee from using the franchisor’s trademarks and trade dress. The court enforced the franchisor’s...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Not at Liberty to Compete

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Michigan granted a preliminary injunction in favor of tax preparation franchisor, Liberty Tax Service (JTH Tax, Inc. v. Magnotte, E.D. Mich., ¶16,575), finding it was likely to succeed on its...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: What to Do About Franchisor’s Harmful New Policies

Lewitt Hackman on

Franchisees aren't always excited when their franchisor introduces a new policy. But if a new policy overreaches and might doom a franchisee's business, can it be stopped before it starts?...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide