News & Analysis as of

Preliminary Injunctions Patent Infringement Patents

A&O Shearman

How to commence main proceedings before the UPC: deadlines and court fees

A&O Shearman on

Patent holders must start Unified Patent Court (UPC) proceedings on the merits within a certain period if they do not want to risk the revocation of provisional measures. The UPC has now clarified that filing the statement of...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

How Should a Licensing Commitment Affect the Availability of Injunctions at the ITC?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Governed by 19 U.S.C. § 337, the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) is empowered to investigate unfair acts in the importation of articles into the United States. The ITC can be a powerful forum for owners of U.S....more

Venable LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms Preliminary Injunction Decisions for EYLEA® Biosimilars

Venable LLP on

On March 5, 2025, the Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of a preliminary injunction against the launch of Celltrion’s proposed EYLEA® (aflibercept) biosimilar CT-P42 in CAFC Case Nos. 24-2058 and 24-2147 (appealing from...more

Jones Day

UK Court of Appeal Provides Guidance on Interim Licenses in Latest FRAND Dispute

Jones Day on

The United Kingdom's Court of Appeal has issued an important decision on the principles governing the grant of interim licenses in standard essential patent ("SEP") disputes....more

Goodwin

Federal Circuit Affirms Injunction Against Celltrion in Aflibercept BPCIA Litigation

Goodwin on

On March 5, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia’s entry of a preliminary injunction preventing Celltrion, Inc. (“Celltrion”) from...more

Hogan Lovells

CJEU expands possibilities for cross-border patent infringement injunctions

Hogan Lovells on

On 25 February, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its much-anticipated decision in BSH Hausgeräte v. Electrolux (C-339/22) on cross-border competence in patent litigation. At the heart of the dispute is...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Eye-Catching: Biosimilars Injunction Prevails

Addressing a preliminary injunction in patent litigation related to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s grant of a...more

Alston & Bird

Patent Case Summaries | Week Ending January 31, 2025

Alston & Bird on

Apple Inc., et al. v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC, Nos. 2023-1501, -1554 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Jan. 27, 2025). Opinion by Dyk, joined by Lourie and Hughes....more

Venable LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms Preliminary Injunctions in EYLEA® Biosimilar Litigations Against Samsung Bioepis and Formycon

Venable LLP on

On January 29, 2025, the CAFC issued opinions affirming the preliminary injunctions issued against biosimilars of Regeneron’s EYLEA® (aflibercept): Samsung Bioepis’s Opuviz™ (aflibercept-yszy) (CAFC Case Nos. 24-1965,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

[Webinar] Litigating in the Unified Patent Court: Strategies for Success - February 11th, 11:00 am - 12:00 pm EST

Nearly two years in, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) continues to reshape the patent litigation landscape in Europe by providing swift, cross-border resolutions and an innovative approach to patent enforcement and revocation....more

WilmerHale

The Rising Threat of German Patent Litigation: Are You Ready?

WilmerHale on

The threat of German patent litigation is rising. Germany is second only to the United States in the number of patent infringement actions brought by non-practicing entities (NPEs), and with the ready availability of...more

A&O Shearman

District Of Massachusetts Invalidates Epigenetics Method Patents For Lack Of Eligible Subject Matter

A&O Shearman on

In biomodal Ltd. v. New England BioLabs, Inc., No. 24-cv-11697-RGS, Dkt. No. 78 (D. Mass. Nov. 2024), Defendant New England BioLabs, Inc. (“NEB”) filed a motion to dismiss the claims of infringement of five patents as...more

Knobbe Martens

Resolving Claim Construction Dispute at 12(b)(6) Stage May Be Error if Specification Indicates Claim Term Does Not Have its Plain...

Knobbe Martens on

UTTO INC. v. METROTECH CORP. Before Prost, Taranto, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: The district court erred in construing the claims at the motion...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Pre-Markman Claim Construction Is OK, Within Limits

McDermott Will & Emery on

In an appeal stemming from the denial of a preliminary injunction and dismissal of the complaint, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit clarified its precedent and explained that a district court may construe claims...more

A&O Shearman

District Court Denies Regeneron’s Motion For Preliminary Injunction To Block Amgen’s Eylea Biosimilar

A&O Shearman on

On September 23, 2024, Judge Kleeh of the Northern District of West Virginia denied Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Regeneron”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”) related to Amgen’s filing of...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2024)

In Natera Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's grant of a preliminary injunction against NeoGenomics in patent infringement litigation involving Natera's U.S. Patent Nos....more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Preliminary Injunction Halts Sales of Tumor-Informed Cancer Screening Test

Late last week in Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. (24-1324), the Federal Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction ruling from the lower court that mostly prohibits NeoGenomics from selling its oncology test...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Judge Garnett “Rolls” Through and Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Sales of Accused Foam Roller Products

On June 14, 2024, Judge Margaret M. Garnett of the Southern District of New York granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in a declaratory judgment action filed by accused infringer PowX Inc., which barred the sales of...more

Knobbe Martens

Delaware Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Seeking To Block Liquidia’s YUTREPIA Launch

Knobbe Martens on

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently denied United Therapeutics Corporation‘s motion for a preliminary injunction.  The motion sought to prevent Liquidia Technologies, Inc. from launching its...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Legal Lens on the Unified Patent Court - March 2024

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is revolutionizing the way patents are enforced in Europe, and McDermott’s intellectual property team is here to help you navigate this dynamic landscape. Our Legal Lens on the Unified Patent...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation Conference in Europe - May 29th - 30th, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Hosted by C5 Group, the 17th Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation in Europe returns for another exciting year with curated programming that will provide up-to-the-minute information and strategic insights on...more

Lathrop GPM

Federal Circuit Reverses Preliminary Injunction on Franchisor’s Patent and Trade Dress Infringement Claim

Lathrop GPM on

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a preliminary injunction granted as to franchisor Urban Air’s patent and trade dress infringement claims against Kangaroo, LLC. UATP IP, LLC v. Kangaroo, LLC, 2024 WL 658205 (Fed....more

McDermott Will & Emery

UPC Court of Appeal Issues First Decision, Overturns Preliminary Injunction

Back in September 2023, the Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) Local Division Munich issued a preliminary injunction against the defendant in 10x Genomics, Inc. v. NanoString Technologies, Inc. On February 26, 2024, in a landmark...more

Knobbe Martens

Middle District of North Carolina Grants Preliminary Injunction in Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

(December 27, 2023) Natera Inc. succeeded in obtaining a preliminary injunction against NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.’s medical assay test. Natera’s ongoing federal lawsuit alleges that NeoGenomics’ product “RaDaR,” a tumor...more

Fish & Richardson

Middle District of North Carolina Finds Public Interest Favors Granting Preliminary Injunction

Fish & Richardson on

On December 27, 2023, Chief Judge Catherine Eagles of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina granted a motion for preliminary injunction by Natera Inc. enjoining NeoGenomics Laboratories Inc. from...more

145 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide