News & Analysis as of

Privity of Contract Additional Insured Endorsements

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

Beware of Blanket Additional Insured Endorsements That Require Contractual Privity

New York High Court Finds No Additional Insured Coverage In Absence of Contractual Privity With Named Insured - It is a common practice in the insurance industry for a project owner to require the general contractor to...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Are You Really An Additional Insured?

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Parties structuring transactions or business relationships often attempt to shift risk to their counter-party by having such party included as an additional insured on the counter-party’s insurance policies. In the real...more

Cozen O'Connor

New York Court Confirms: Additional Insured Coverage Limited to Contractual Privity

Cozen O'Connor on

On September 15, 2016, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department found that an additional insured endorsement provided additional insured coverage only to the entity in direct contractual privity with...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide