News & Analysis as of

Regulatory Takings Real Estate Development

Nossaman LLP

Group Seeks Permitting Requirement for Bird Deaths at Commercial Buildings

Nossaman LLP on

On September 4, 2024, the Center for Biological Diversity, along with more than 20 other groups, (collectively, CBD) delivered a petition (Petition) to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) in which CBD requested the...more

Nossaman LLP

What Constitutes a “Larger Parcel?”

Nossaman LLP on

In California, a fundamental principle of eminent domain law is that an owner of property acquired by eminent domain is entitled to just compensation for the property interests taken (Code Civ. Proc. §1263.010)....more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter - May 2022, Volume I, Issue XIII

Goulston & Storrs PC on

CASES OF NOTE - FINALIZE BUILDING PLANS EARLY ON TO AVOID DELAYS - St. Paul's Foundation v. Ives, 29F.4th 32, 33 (1st Cir. 2022) - A recent decision out of the First Circuit Court of Appeals emphasizes the...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter - March 2022, Volume I, Issue XII

Goulston & Storrs PC on

CASES OF NOTE - SIMILAR PROJECTS, DIFFERENT DECISIONS - Brossi, et al. v. Town of Grafton Planning Board, et al., No. 19 MISC 000551 (MDV), 2021 WL 5833935 (Mass. Land Ct. Dec. 9, 2021) - The Massachusetts Land...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Property Owner’s Request for Court-Determined Just Compensation Backfires

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The facts at issue in Elpa Builders, Inc. v. State of New York are relatively straightforward.  The property owner (the “Owner”) owned a 53,645-square-foot parcel of property (the “Property”) along New York State Route 347...more

Nossaman LLP

Is California Coming for Your Beach House?

Nossaman LLP on

Yes, but the sea might beat them to it. In 2015, the California Coastal Commission adopted the Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance. This Guidance document discusses a number of potential measures for responding to sea level rise,...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Suffolk County Trap And Skeet Range May Be Silenced By Town Noise Ordinance

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

BANG! Yaphank, New York.  In November 2019, after years of protracted ligation, Hunter Sports Shooting Grounds, Inc., (“HSSG”) the operator of the Suffolk County Skeet, Trap & Sporting Clays Range (“Range”), was dealt another...more

Bilzin Sumberg

Real Estate Developer Rights When Cities Demand Too Much

Bilzin Sumberg on

Land use & zoning attorneys, Stanley B. Price and Anthony De Yurre, discuss what real estate developer's rights are when the government demands too much, and where the line should be drawn according to both statute and case...more

Nossaman LLP

When Does the California Coastal Act Bar a Takings Challenge?

Nossaman LLP on

In a recent published decision, the California Court of Appeal had the opportunity to address this issue when the property owners of a beachside residence in the City of Los Angeles challenged a setback condition that the...more

Nossaman LLP

Sea-Level Rise, Managed Retreat, and Eminent Domain in California

Nossaman LLP on

Thanks to all of you who were able to attend Nossaman’s Coastal Law Conference last week.  If you missed the event, I provided an update on sea-level rise, managed retreat, and potential eminent domain / regulatory takings...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

No Right to Jury Trial for Regulatory Taking Claim: Pierce Atwood Partner Michelle O’Brien Successfully Argues Before...

Pierce Atwood LLP on

Resolving an issue not previously decided by Massachusetts appellate courts, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a landowner is not entitled to a jury trial on a regulatory taking claim....more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

When Is A Regulatory Denial a Regulatory Taking? Not Very Often, At Least in Massachusetts

On Tuesday, the Massachusetts Appeals Court denied a regulatory takings claim brought by a plaintiff whose development plans for her property in Falmouth were denied by the Falmouth Conservation Commission. Plaintiff’s...more

Nossaman LLP

Regulatory Taking May Result From Improper CEQA Determination? Stay Tuned

Nossaman LLP on

A few months ago, we reported on a Court of Appeal decision, Bottini v. City of San Diego, where the Court held that delays resulting from a governmental agency’s improper denial of a permit application for a new development...more

Perkins Coie

29th Annual Land Use & Development Law Briefing - 2019

Perkins Coie on

Land Use and Development Case Summaries (short form) - 1. PLANNING AND ZONING - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE V. CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, 26 Cal. App. 5th 689 (2018) - Based on the language and...more

Genova Burns LLC

Municipalities Must Demonstrate “Necessity” Linked to a Redevelopment Project to Condemn

Genova Burns LLC on

The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed a decision allowing the Borough of Glassboro to condemn property just because it was part of a “Redevelopment Area” and has been since 2000. In Borough of Glassboro v. Grossman....more

Perkins Coie

CEQA Project Baseline Should Not Have Been Set Prior to Demolition of Historic Structure

Perkins Coie on

The Fourth District Court of Appeal held that the project baseline under CEQA for construction of a new home did not include demolition of a potential historic structure that had occurred before submittal of a permit...more

Nossaman LLP

Court Affirms Coastal Commission’s Consideration Of Takings Issues

Nossaman LLP on

The California Coastal Act establishes another layer of regulation governing “development” in the Coastal Zone. Development under the Coastal Act is defined to encompass essentially everything and anything. ...more

Miller Starr Regalia

Fourth District Holds City Violated CEQA By Refusing To Recognize Exemption For Single Family Residence Project And Attempting To...

Miller Starr Regalia on

In a published opinion filed September 18, 2018, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed a judgment granting a writ setting aside the City of San Diego’s (City) decision to subject a coastal development permit...more

Nossaman LLP

Improper CEQA Determination Does Not Trigger Regulatory Taking

Nossaman LLP on

When a governmental agency improperly denies a permit application for a new development, and the proposed development is thereby delayed, does this result in a regulatory taking? ...more

Nossaman LLP

Another Regulatory Takings Case Gets Lost In The Procedural Maze

Nossaman LLP on

For those of you who have followed Nossaman’s eminent domain blog since the very early days, you’ll recall our coverage of a significant regulatory takings case, Monks v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes. ...more

Nossaman LLP

Should Property Owners Pursue Takings Claims in State or Federal Court?

Nossaman LLP on

When state and local governments impose unreasonable conditions or exactions on private property, owners pursuing a regulatory takings claim often face a maze of procedural obstacles just to have their case heard. ...more

Nossaman LLP

Another Inverse Condemnation Temporary Damages Claim Fails to Get Off the Ground

Nossaman LLP on

As we’ve seen all too many times in California, when local municipalities delay development approvals — even improperly — courts are reluctant to find liability under an inverse condemnation cause of action and award...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Property Owner to Maintain Public Beach Access Over Coastal Property - California Court of Appeal Weighs in on California Coastal...

Under the California Coastal Act, a beachfront property owner must maintain public access over his property — and will be required to seek a Coastal Development Permit if he wishes to limit such public access, a California...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation from regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation for regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

25 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide