News & Analysis as of

Reimbursements Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Supreme Court of the United States

ArentFox Schiff

No More Surprise Medical Bills: Fifth Circuit Affirms Vacatur of Arbitration Provisions of Surprise Billing Rules (TMA II)

ArentFox Schiff on

On August 2, health care providers scored yet another significant victory when the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the vacatur of various federal regulations regarding the arbitration procedures used to...more

ArentFox Schiff

Post-Chevron Health Care Regulations: The Dawn of a New Day

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 28, the US Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine — the legal principle that the judiciary should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. Chevron reflected the view...more

Baker Donelson

What the Supreme Court's "Chevron Deference" Ruling Could Mean for Health Care Law

Baker Donelson on

Baker Donelson recently published Anticipating SCOTUS Ruling on Chevron Deference – What to Know and Five Ways to Prepare explaining the United States Supreme Court's upcoming ruling which is expected to impact the regulatory...more

McDermott Will & Emery

District Court Vacates 340B Cuts, But Don’t Expect Immediate Payment Rate Restoration

McDermott Will & Emery on

On September 28, 2022, the US District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the 2022 rule under which the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reduced Medicare Part B payments on 340B drugs paid under the...more

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP

U.S. District Court Judge Vacates Unlawful Drug Reimbursement Rate For 340B Hospitals for Remainder of 2022

As we reported previously in this post on our Healthcare Perspectives blog, the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this summer held that the federal government improperly lowered drug reimbursement payments to certain 340B hospitals...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Rejects Adjustments to Certain Prescription Reimbursements

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with medical providers on June 15, 2022, after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cut Medicare Part B reimbursements to healthcare providers serving disadvantaged communities....more

ArentFox Schiff

Court Side-Steps Overturning “Chevron” Deference in Recent Health-Care Related Decision

ArentFox Schiff on

The concept of “administrative deference” is a key component to the modern regulatory state. An important aspect of administrative deference is the “Chevron doctrine,” i.e. the concept that the courts should defer to relevant...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Holland & Knight Health Dose: June 22, 2022

Holland & Knight LLP on

Holland & Knight Health Dose is an in-depth weekly dose of legislative and regulatory insights to keep stakeholders abreast of happenings in Washington, D.C., impacting the health sector. This week's topics include ...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

340B Hospitals Win in Medicare OPPS Supreme Court Decision

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court issued a long-awaited victory to 340B hospitals this week, when it held in American Hospital Association et al. v. Becerra et al. that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had set unlawful...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

340B Medicare Reimbursement Cuts Ruled Unlawful by Supreme Court

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the American Hospital Association and against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), holding that the 2018 and 2019 Medicare reimbursement cuts for 340B hospitals...more

Lathrop GPM

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Two Hospital Cases This Week

Lathrop GPM on

This is a big legal week for hospitals and health systems as the U.S. Supreme Court heard not one, but TWO different oral arguments related to federal government payments to hospitals and health systems. In both cases, the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Rules Government Must Pay $12 Billion to Health Insurers Under ACA Risk Corridor Program

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On April 27, 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled by an 8-1 decision that the federal government must pay billions of dollars to health insurers who sold consumer policies on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA”)...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - August 2015

Proskauer Rose LLP on

Editor's Overview - As the summer draws to a close, this month's Newsletter previews three cases that the U.S. Supreme Court already has agreed to hear that ought to be of particular interest to ERISA plan sponsors and...more

Benesch

Supreme Court Blocks Provider Challenges to Medicaid Program

Benesch on

On March 31, 2015, the Supreme Court issued the first of several expected decisions that will impact the healthcare industry this year, ruling that Medicaid providers have no constitutional or statutory right to challenge a...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Says Private Health Care Providers Cannot Sue to Force State of Idaho to Raise Its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates

King & Spalding on

In Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., Case No. 14-15, issued March 31, 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a group of private health care providers could not sue officials in Idaho’s Department of...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide