News & Analysis as of

Rescission Regulation Z

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Nutter Bank Report: March 2021

Federal Reserve Issues New Guidance on Managing the LIBOR Transition - The Federal Reserve has issued guidance on how examiners will assess a banking organization’s progress in preparing to transition to a replacement rate...more

Akerman LLP

Regulation Z, COVID-19, and Bona Fide Personal Financial Emergency Waivers

Akerman LLP on

On April 29, 2020, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an interpretive rule clarifying Regulation Z's bona fide personal financial emergency provisions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CFPB...more

Burr & Forman

CFPB Allows Waiting Periods under TILA and RESPA to be Modified or Waived Due to COVID-19

Burr & Forman on

On April 29, 2020, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an interpretive rule allowing certain consumers to modify to waive certain waiting periods required under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Real...more

BCLP

Lender’s “Boilerplate” Disavowal Dooms Rescission of a Common Loan Modification Agreement

BCLP on

In a case with potentially broad implications, the Sixth Circuit becomes the first federal circuit court to hold that the Truth in Lending Act provides no right to rescind a loan modification agreement entered into with a...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Supreme Court’s Jesinoski Ruling Provides Clarity on TILA Rescission While Creating Many Questions

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On January 13, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court settled a circuit court split regarding how and when a mortgage borrower may exercise the right of rescission under the Truth-in-Lending-Act (“TILA”) and the CFPB’s implementing...more

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

Rescission of Home Mortgage Loans

The Truth-in-Lending Act (“Act”) was adopted in 1969. It has spawned dozens of lawsuits and hundreds of administrative rules and interpretations. Recently, the United States Supreme Court had an opportunity to address the...more

Blank Rome LLP

Supreme Court Rules Written Notice Is Sufficient to Rescind under TILA

Blank Rome LLP on

Action Item: In light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Jesinoski, lenders should be aware that written notice provided by the borrower, within three years of the loan consummation, is sufficient to exercise...more

Bilzin Sumberg

Supreme Court Eases Requirements for Homeowners Rescinding Mortgages

Bilzin Sumberg on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. that borrowers exercising their right to rescind mortgages under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) only need to provide written notice to...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

No Lawsuit Required to Rescind: U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Mortgage Rescission Notification Requirements for Borrowers under...

Background of Notice versus Lawsuit Issue - The Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), as implemented by Regulation Z, provides borrowers with a powerful tool: the right to rescind certain mortgage loan transactions. This...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Right of Rescission Not Unlimited, Maryland Court of Appeals Holds

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The timing and mechanics of rescinding a loan under the Truth and Lending Act (TILA) has been a hotly contested legal issue. As highlighted during the recent oral argument in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. before...more

Goodwin

Utah Federal Court Rules on “Clear and Conspicuous” Requirement under the Truth-in-Lending Act

Goodwin on

The United States District Court for the District of Utah partially granted summary judgment for borrowers alleging that their mortgage lender violated the Truth in Lending Act, and its implementing regulation, Regulation Z. ...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide