News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Clean Water Act › Hawkes Co v United States Army Corps of Engineers

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Womble Bond Dickinson

Expansion of the "Waters of the U.S." Rule Delayed; Replacement Rule in the Works

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On February 6, 2018, the EPA formally suspended the Obama-era “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) rule until 2020. This delayed implementation will provide the Trump administration with additional time to issue a clearer, and...more

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Supreme Court's Wetlands Decision Pays Off For Business

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP on

It did not take long for the Hawkes Company to see the benefits of the Supreme Court’s May 31, 2016 decision granting the company the right to challenge in federal court the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (the Corps) approved...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Environmental Case Law Update

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

“Summer’s lease hath all too short a date.” Many important environmental and administrative law decisions were reported by the federal and state courts over the past six months. The courts are dealing with very...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Supreme Court’s Environmental and Administrative Law Decisions in 2015-2016 Term

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

This Advisory briefly reports on some of the significant U.S. Supreme Court actions from January through June 2016 related to environmental and administrative law. ...more

Williams Mullen

Regulated Parties – 2, Regulators – 0

Williams Mullen on

The United States Supreme Court has handed regulated parties their second win in four years concerning when they can take EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to court over wetlands permitting issues. In 2012, the...more

Williams Mullen

Environmental Notes - July 2016

Williams Mullen on

CONGRESS FINDS THE FORMULA TO REFORM CHEMICAL REGULATION - The Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) is the primary federal law by which the manufacture, import and use of chemical substances are regulated in the United...more

Ruder Ware

Wetlands Determinations - Uncertainty for the Clean Water Rule?

Ruder Ware on

On May 31, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc. holding that approved judicial determinations as to the presence of wetlands issued by the...more

Carlton Fields

SCOTUS Gives Landowners New Tools to Challenge Wetlands Permitting Decisions

Carlton Fields on

The United States Supreme Court handed landowners and developers a win this month in a unanimous decision allowing appeals to federal courts of Army Corps of Engineers determinations that a body of water or wetland is subject...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Rules Landowners Can Challenge Jurisdictional Determinations

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On May 31, 2016, in a unanimous ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held in USACE v. Hawkes Co. that approved jurisdictional determinations (“JD”) are final actions which can be reviewed by the courts. Under the Clean Water Act a...more

Jackson Walker

The Supreme Court Holds that Army Corps’ Jurisdictional Determinations are Final Actions Subject to Judicial Review

Jackson Walker on

On May 31, 2016, in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., the US Supreme Court unanimously held that a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) approved jurisdictional determination (JD) is a final agency action...more

Allen Matkins

California Environmental Law & Policy Update - June 2016

Allen Matkins on

Environmental and Policy Focus - U.S. Supreme Court allows pre-permit challenges to approved jurisdictional determinations - Allen Matkins - May 31 - In a major new legal development for the Clean Water Act's...more

K&L Gates LLP

Supreme Court Authorizes Judicial Review of Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Determinations Over Federal Government’s Objection

K&L Gates LLP on

In a rebuke to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), the United States Supreme Court unanimously held on May 31, 2016, in Corps v. Hawkes that jurisdictional determinations (“JDs”) under the Clean Water Act are...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Sides with Property Owners: Jurisdictional Determination is Reviewable

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court decided that Army Corps’ jurisdictional determinations are judicially reviewable. This decision leaves open the question of whether other types of administrative decisions are immediately...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

Supreme Court Again Sinks Government on Wetlands

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

A few months ago, we (and most everyone else not working at the Justice Department) predicted that the Supreme Court would rule that property owners seeking to develop potential federal wetlands on their property may...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Unanimous Supreme Court Sides With Property Owners In Clean Water Act Row

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

Introduction - On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision that continues a trend of judicial skepticism toward federal agency efforts to avoid judicial review of agency permitting and related...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Holds US Army Corps Clean Water Act Determinations Reviewable

Morgan Lewis on

Decision allows landowners to challenge in court a US Army Corps of Engineers’ determination that a property is subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court: Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Determinations Challengeable in Federal Court

Holland & Knight LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on May 31, 2016, in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc., No. 15-290, slip op., 578 U.S. ___ (2016) that approved jurisdictional determinations (JDs) issued by...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Supreme Court Allows Challenges to Section 404 Jurisdictional Determinations

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc., No. 15-290 (May 31, 2016) - Why It Matters: The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously concluded that property owners who are required to obtain Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404...more

Stoel Rives LLP

Clean Water Act Client Alert: US Supreme Court Concludes US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland "Jurisdictional Determinations"...

Stoel Rives LLP on

Earlier this week, the US Supreme Court unanimously concluded that wetland determinations by the US Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) under the Clean Water Act constitute final agency action, meaning that landowners can...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Jurisdictional Determinations Are Reviewable By The Courts

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc. (5/31/16, No. 15-290) - In a widely anticipated decision in the wake of the Sackette v. EPA (132 S.Ct. 1367 (2012) decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that...more

WilmerHale

Supreme Court Provides for Judicial Review of Army Corps Determinations

WilmerHale on

On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States held that final determinations by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the presence or absence of “waters of the United States” can be appealed to the courts. The...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court Clears Path for Appeal of Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Determinations

Burr & Forman on

An approved jurisdictional determination (“JD”) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) can be appealed to Federal District Court according to a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision issued May 31, 2016, U.S....more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Rules that Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Determinations Are Reviewable in Court

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on May 31, 2016 that an approved jurisdictional determination issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act is a final agency action subject to judicial review. Hawkes Co.,...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision Authorizing Review of Wetland Jurisdictional Determinations

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on

On May 31, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an eagerly anticipated decision that will benefit landowners and developers by authorizing immediate judicial review of Approved Jurisdictional Determinations (JDs) issued by the...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

The Supreme Court Confirms Right to Challenge Jurisdictional Determinations

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

Can a landowner challenge a US Army Corps of Engineers determination that a property contains jurisdictional wetlands? In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative May 31, 2016 in USACE...more

39 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide