News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Commercial Marketing

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Goodwin

Year in Review: Top Five Legal Developments of 2017

Goodwin on

Here are our picks for the top-five most significant legal developments regarding biosimilars in 2017...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Federal Circuit Rules that BPCIA Preempts State Law Biosimilars Claims

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

In an opinion issued on December 14, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the 2010 Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) preempts the use of state law to penalize...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Skipping The Patent Dance: U.S. Supreme Court In Amgen V Sandoz Makes It More Difficult For Patent Owners To Delay Marketing Of...

Ladas & Parry LLP on

On June 12, 2017, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Thomas in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., the United States Supreme Court considered the complex statutory scheme that attempts to expedite resolution of patent...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - July 2017

Knobbe Martens on

District Court Abused Discretion in Not Finding Case Exceptional - In Rothschild Connected Devices v. Guardian Protection Services, Appeal No. 2016-2521, the Federal Circuit held that a district court abused its discretion...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

You Can Dance If You Want To

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

In borrowing a page from the '80s band "Men Without Hats," on June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court brought greater certainty for both biosimilar applicants and originator companies. In Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the Supreme...more

Goodwin

Amgen v. Sandoz: Sandoz Requests Remand to District Court

Goodwin on

As we have previously reported, on June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Amgen v. Sandoz holding that notice of commercial marketing may be given prior to FDA approval. The Court also held that no...more

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis

Supreme Court Decision Allows Faster Marketing of Biosimilars

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis on

On Monday, June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that manufacturers making biosimilars of biologic drugs did not have to wait until after gaining federal approval of the biosimilar to...more

Hogan Lovells

ITC Section 337 – Quarterly Highlights

Hogan Lovells on

SCOTUS Narrows Opportunity For ITC Section 337 Jurisdiction Over Imported Biosimilars Based On 180-Day Notice Provision - In Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., 794 F.3d 1347, 1357-58 (Fed. Cir. 2015), the Federal Circuit held that...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Does Amgen Have Viable State Law Claims Against Sandoz Arising From The Zarxio Biosimilar Patent Dispute?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. (which you can read more about here), the Supreme Court held that 42 USC § 262(l)(9)(C) sets forth the exclusive federal remedy for failing to provide a copy of the biosimilar application to the...more

BakerHostetler

The Supreme Court Delivers a Win for Biosimilar Manufacturers in Sandoz v. Amgen

BakerHostetler on

On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Sandoz v. Amgen, interpreting key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) in favor of biosimilar manufacturers...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

SCOTUS: Supreme Court Lifts Biosimilars by Allowing Early Commercial Marketing Notice

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., marking the first time the Court has interpreted the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) for the approval of biosimilar drugs. On...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court: Biosimilar Applicants May Provide Commercial Marketing Notice Before FDA Approval

Jones Day on

On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two important questions under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA"), which provides an abbreviated pathway for the approval of generic biologics: (i) the...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

SCOTUS Ruling Gives a Boost to Biosimilars; FDA Continues to Advance Products Through AdComs

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

On a sweltering hot D.C. morning, those of us anxiously awaiting the Supreme Court’s opinion in its first case involving biosimilar biological products finally exhaled. The June 12, 2017 opinion followed the parties’ oral...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Amgen v. Sandoz: The Supreme Court’s First Biosimilars Ruling

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

In a unanimous decision issued on June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court for the first time interpreted key provisions of the 2010 Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”). See Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., No. 15-1195...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Permits Biosimilar Drugs to Be Marketed Sooner

Snell & Wilmer on

On June 12, 2017, in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that a drug manufacturer may give a required 180-day notice of its intent to market a biosimilar drug before receiving FDA...more

Jackson Walker

SCOTUS Simplifies Market Entry Process for Biosimilar Products

Jackson Walker on

Yesterday’s unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Sandoz v. Amgen injects much needed certainty into a difficult statute and streamlines the process for biosimilar products to enter the marketplace following FDA...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

The Patent Dance Is Optional

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

In Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the Supreme Court brought greater certainty to two key issues relating to the “patent dance” under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). First, the Court held that where a...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Sandoz, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Sandoz, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc., Nos. 15-1039, 15-1195, in which it held that (a) a manufacturer of a licensed biological product cannot obtain federal injunctive relief to enforce 42...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Industry Perspectives On The Biosimilar Patent Dance

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court could issue its decision in the Amgen v. Sandoz biosimilar patent dance case any day now. Last week I participated in a panel discussion with industry stakeholders considering how the decision might–or might...more

Goodwin

BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Decision in Sandoz v. Amgen

Goodwin on

We previously reported on the oral argument in Sandoz v. Amgen. Justice Thomas has delivered the opinion for a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Sandoz v. Amgen. Briefly, the Supreme Court held that notice of commercial...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen

Jones Day on

On April 26, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. (Nos. 15-1039, 15-1195), on appeal from the Federal Circuit's July 21, 2015, opinion interpreting various provisions of the Biologics...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

How Will The Supreme Court Choreograph The Biosimilar Patent Dance?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On April 26, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Amgen v. Sandoz, where the parties have asked the Court to interpret two of the biosimilar patent dance provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation...more

Goodwin

Reminder: Supreme Court Arguments on April 26th in Amgen v. Sandoz

Goodwin on

As a reminder to our readers, tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Amgen v. Sandoz regarding the following questions: ..Whether a biosimilar applicant is required by 42 U.S.C. § 262(l)(2)(A) to provide...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Oral Argument in Sandoz v. Amgen

Goodwin on

The Supreme Court held a 70-minute oral argument in Sandoz v. Amgen this morning. Before beginning the argument, the Chief Justice announced that the Court would give each side five extra minutes–a highly unusual step...more

Goodwin

AARP, AHIP, and Others File Amicus Briefs in Sandoz v. Amgen

Goodwin on

As we have previously reported, the Supreme Court will next month hear arguments in Sandoz v. Amgen regarding the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the BPCIA’s notice of commercial marketing requirement and patent dance...more

31 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide