News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › False Claims Act (FCA) › The United States Federal Communications Commission

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Mintz - Technology, Communications & Media...

Supreme Court Confirms That the Federal Claims Act Applies to the FCC's E-rate Program

Mintz - Technology, Communications & Media... on

Last Friday, in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, the Supreme Court unanimously held that requests for funding from the FCC’s E-rate program are “claims” for purposes of the False Claims Act (FCA), settling...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Supreme Court Allows Treble-Damage False Claims Actions To Proceed Against E-Rate Service Providers

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

Broadband and telecommunications service providers should redouble efforts to comply with the rules of the FCC's "E-Rate" program that subsidizes service to schools and libraries as a result of a Supreme Court ruling that...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On February 21, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, holding that a whistleblower can bring a False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuit against a telecommunications carrier over...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - February 21, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Heath, No. 23-1127: This case considers whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal...more

Saul Ewing LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in False Claims Act Case

Saul Ewing LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Todd Heath, Docket No. 23-1127, a case in which the Court agreed to review whether reimbursement requests submitted to the...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

True Facts About False Claims: MoFo's FCA Newsletter - October 2024

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

Designed for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, this newsletter seeks to bring you up to speed on key federal and state False Claims Act (FCA) developments, with links to primary resources. Each quarter, we...more

McCarter & English Blog: Government Contracts...

Wisconsin Bell: Testing the Elasticity of False Claims Act’s Scope

McCarter & English Blog: Government Contracts... on

Just how broad is the scope of the False Claims Act (FCA)? That is the basic question posed in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Heath, No. 23-1127. Put more directly, the case addresses whether reimbursement requests...more

Hogan Lovells

Supreme Court to hear case concerning the scope of the FCA where private dollars are involved

Hogan Lovells on

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal in the telecommunications case Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, No. 23-1127, to assess whether reimbursement requests submitted to...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide