News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Hobbs Act

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Wiley Rein LLP

The Supreme Court Overruled Chevron. What Comes Next For Telecommunications, Media, and Technology?

Wiley Rein LLP on

On Friday, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal agencies are no longer entitled to deference when they interpret ambiguous statutes. Loper Bright thus overrules an earlier Supreme...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 22, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., No. 20-1641: This case concerns the interpretation of the Medicare Secondary Payer Act’s (MSPA) anti-discrimination provisions regarding individuals with...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Punts On Whether FCC’s Interpretation of the TCPA Binds Federal Courts

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

At the end of the Supreme Court’s most recent term, the Court released its long-awaited ruling in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 2051 (June 20, 2019)—a case that could have carried...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Leaves Uncertainty For Navigating TCPA Landmines

Amundsen Davis LLC on

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits unsolicited calls, text messages and faxes; it’s a federal statute that provides for statutory damages between $500-$1,500 per violation. With the speed and ease (and...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Sends Case Interpreting TCPA Back to Lower Court

Hudson Cook, LLP on

Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in 1992 to regulate how people communicate by phone and fax. The TCPA gave the Federal Communications Commission regulatory authority to issue rules expanding on the...more

Baker Donelson

SCOTUS Punts on TCPA Guidance

Baker Donelson on

In its long-awaited ruling addressing whether the Administrative Orders Review Act (Hobbs Act) requires district courts to accept the FCC's legal interpretations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the TCPA), the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Balks on Judicial Deference to FCC in TCPA Case, While Concurrence Led by Justice Kavanaugh Looks to Swing

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP on

TCPA litigators have been closely monitoring the U.S. Supreme Court's docket waiting for a ruling in the PDR Network case. At stake is what kind of judicial deference should be given to the FCC's interpretation of the...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Supreme Court Leaves Unanswered Whether District Courts Must Defer to FCC’s Interpretations

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court remanded for consideration to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit two preliminary questions antecedent to the main issue of whether federal district courts must defer to the Federal...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 24, 2019

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions on June 24, 2019: Iancu v. Brunetti, No. 18-302: Respondent Erik Brunetti founded a clothing line that uses as its trademark four letters that though spelled...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS Punts on Whether FCC's TCPA Interpretations Bind District Courts

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In November 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court had granted certiorari in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., to decide whether the Hobbs Act required the district court to accept the Federal Communications...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

The Impact of PDR Network LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on

Are district courts prohibited in every instance from considering challenges to the Federal Communication Commission (“FCC”)’s interpretation of certain provisions in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act – or can district...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Opens New Line of Attack on Federal Agency Interpretations of Federal Law

Perkins Coie on

In a recent decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal district court was not necessarily bound by the Federal Communications Commission’s prior interpretation of a federal statute over which the agency has...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court Leaves Open Issue of Federal Communication Agency Interpretation Of TCPA, For Now

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Dodging the question of whether the Hobbs Act requires a federal court to accept the 2006 Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Order that provides the legal interpretation for the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA),...more

Hogan Lovells

U.S. Supreme Court Sidesteps Important TCPA Deference Issues

Hogan Lovells on

On June 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in PDR v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic.  The Court was expected to provide greater clarity about the extent to which litigants can challenge the Federal...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc.

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, holding that whether the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2006 order interpreting the...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

BREAKING: Supreme Court Vacates and Remands TCPA Case to Fourth Circuit for Further Analysis

Womble Bond Dickinson on

It is a busy TCPA news day! The United States Supreme Court has released its decision in PDR Networks, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., a TCPA junk fax class action. The decision is available for download...more

Benesch

Supreme Court Punts On Whether Courts Are Bound By FCC Orders On The TCPA, But Not Without A Convincing Concurring Opinion

Benesch on

Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court issued its decision in PDR Network, LLC, et al. v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. At issue was whether a TCPA-defendant in a civil case may contest the Federal Communications...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Hears Argument in TCPA Appeal: What It Could Mean for Your Business

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Recall that, a couple months ago, the Supreme Court granted the Petition for Certiorari in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., a TCPA junk fax class action proceeding, setting the stage for what we...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

"Estoppel on Steroids" - Does the Hobbs Act Require the District Court to Accept the FCC's Rule Interpreting an "Unsolicited...

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP on

On March 25, 2019, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on appeal from the Fourth Circuit's decision issued in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. The issue is whether a district court must...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

REDIAL: 2018 TCPA Year-in-Review – Analysis of Critical Issues and Trends in TCPA Compliance and Litigation

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Eversheds Sutherland is pleased to send you its fifth annual REDIAL: 2018 TCPA YEAR-IN-REVIEW – ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL ISSUES AND TRENDS IN TCPA COMPLIANCE AND LITIGATION. Inside this digital edition, you will find our...more

Proskauer - Advertising Law

SCOTUS to Decide If Courts Must Defer to the FCC’s Interpretation of “Unsolicited Advertisements” under the TCPA

Proskauer - Advertising Law on

On November 13, 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to consider the amount of deference a federal court is required to give the Federal Communications Commission in determining what constitutes an unsolicited advertisement within...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Deference or preference – Supreme Court to address agency authority in context of TCPA litigation

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Are courts bound by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rulings and orders in deciding Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) cases? The United States Supreme Court has agreed to take on a case raising this very issue. ...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court To Review FCC Deference In TCPA Cases

BakerHostetler on

On Nov. 13, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. PDR Network, LLC, after the Fourth Circuit vacated a lower court ruling regarding what constitutes an “unsolicited...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Grants Cert in TCPA Junk Fax Case to Determine Whether the Hobbs Act Trumps the Chevron Doctrine

Goodwin on

On November 13, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic (No. 17-1705), to answer the question whether the Hobbs Act required the district court to accept the Federal...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

U.S. Supreme Court to Review Deference to the FCC in TCPA Cases

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on

Does the Hobbs Act require district courts to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act? That is the question the United States Supreme Court will consider...more

44 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide