News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Hobbs Act › Statutory Interpretation

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Best Best & Krieger LLP

Supreme Court Rules District Courts Not Bound by FCC Statutory Interpretations under the Hobbs Act

Best Best & Krieger LLP on

On Friday, June 20th, the Supreme Court in McLaughlin Chiropractic Assoc., Inc. v. McKesson Corp., No. 23-1226 (U.S. June 2025), ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Hobbs Act does not bind federal district courts in civil...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

SCOTUS Says District Courts Are Not Bound by FCC Orders Interpreting the TCPA

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on

On June 20, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered an opinion that could dramatically change the landscape of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)....more

Cooley LLP

SCOTUS Continues to Limit Authority of Regulatory Agencies by Empowering District Courts to Reject FCC Interpretations

Cooley LLP on

Suppose an administrative agency issues a rule governing private conduct. And suppose no one uses an available judicial review process to challenge that rule before it takes effect. If that rule is then invoked against a...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Nuclear Regulatory Commission Procedural Issue

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, 2025, decided Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), which involved challenges to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC or Commission) decision to grant a...more

McGlinchey Stafford

SCOTUS: Hobbs Act Does Not Bind District Courts to FCC’s Statute Interpretation

McGlinchey Stafford on

Following in the wake of last years’ Loper Bright and Relentless, Inc. decisions that ended agency deference, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday in McLaughlin Chiropractic Assoc., Inc. v. McKesson Corp. that the Hobbs Act...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 23, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On June 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions: Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 24-7: This case addresses fuel producers’ Article III standing to...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Courts No Longer Have to Follow FCC Rulings

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on

In a landmark decision released on June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Hobbs Act does not require federal district courts to treat Federal Communications Commission (FCC) orders as binding precedent in private...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Supreme Court Rules Hobbs Act Does Not Bind District Courts to Agency Interpretations

Troutman Pepper Locke on

In a significant ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered its 6-3 opinion in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, addressing the scope of judicial review under the Hobbs Act. The decision marks a...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 18, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions today: United States v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477: This case addresses a constitutional challenge to Tennessee’s Prohibition on Medical Procedures Performed on Minors...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Supreme Court’s Hazy Junk Faxes Case Is Sure to Affect Compliance

Rumberger | Kirk on

Companies that rely on digital marketing are awaiting a pivotal decision from the US Supreme Court on how federal courts should treat a Federal Communications Commission interpretation of a law against junk faxes. ...more

Rumberger | Kirk

High Court Could Further Limit Deference With TCPA Fax Case in Law360

Rumberger | Kirk on

Are district courts bound by both interpretive and final rules issued by the Federal Communications Commission? The U.S. Supreme Court‘s decision to hear the case of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates Inc. v. McKesson...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Case Regarding FCC’s Authority to Interpret Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case that has the potential to sound the death knell to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) authority to bind courts to its interpretation of the Telephone...more

McGlinchey Stafford

SCOTUS Hears Arguments on Judicial Interpretation of Agency Authority Under the TCPA

McGlinchey Stafford on

On January 21, 2025, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, et al., a case and decision that may have an outsized impact on the nature of judicial review of...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on the Scope of Judicial Review Under the Hobbs Act

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On January 21, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation. As discussed here, the primary issue is whether the Hobbs Act, which limits judicial...more

Cozen O'Connor

SCOTUS Poised to Expand District Court Review of FCC Orders

Cozen O'Connor on

Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case that will likely determine whether a federal district court or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the final say on how to interpret the Telephone...more

Mintz - Technology, Communications & Media...

Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — Will the Supreme Court Revive TCPA Fax Cases and Deliver Another Blow...

Mintz - Technology, Communications & Media... on

The Supreme Court is poised to provide further guidance on the limits of agency rulings. The case is McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation et al., No. 23-1226, and it raises the issue of whether the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court accepts case seeking to determine whether district courts must accept FCC’s interpretation of TCPA

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider a case that could clarify whether the Hobbs Act, which limits judicial review of FCC final orders to appeals courts, means that district courts must accept the FCC’s...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Supreme Court to consider FCC's power to interpret the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

The United States Supreme Court will hear the case McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, which poses the question of whether federal district courts, under the Hobbs Act, must adhere to the rulings...more

Wiley Rein LLP

The Supreme Court Overruled Chevron. What Comes Next For Telecommunications, Media, and Technology?

Wiley Rein LLP on

On Friday, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal agencies are no longer entitled to deference when they interpret ambiguous statutes. Loper Bright thus overrules an earlier Supreme...more

Benesch

Supreme Court Punts On Whether Courts Are Bound By FCC Orders On The TCPA, But Not Without A Convincing Concurring Opinion

Benesch on

Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court issued its decision in PDR Network, LLC, et al. v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. At issue was whether a TCPA-defendant in a civil case may contest the Federal Communications...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Controlled Chaos?: FCC Withdraws Overruled Portion of Solicited Fax Rule One Day After Supreme Court Accepts Review of Different...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The TCPA jockeying continues at the FCC. As we reported on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court has just granted cert to determine whether or not the FCC’s definition of “unsolicited advertisement” in its 2006 Junk Fax Ruling...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

From a Deference Dimension: Breaking Down the Supreme Court’s Grant of Certiorari to Consider Whether the Hobbs Act Requires...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

As reported earlier today, the Supreme Court granted the Petition for Certiorari in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, 2018 WL 3127423 (U.S. Nov. 13, 2018) to consider the following legal...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide