News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Private Right of Action

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

The Supreme Court’s Latest Rulings on Administrative Agencies: Implications for ‎Consumer Product Companies

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

In the final week of this year’s Supreme Court term, the Court issued several decisions that alter the role of federal agencies in the way laws are interpreted and enforced, and thus the way that business will be done in the...more

Goodwin

SCOTUS Ruling Makes Federal Agency Rules Susceptible to Previously Untimely Challenges

Goodwin on

​​​​​​​At the close of an extended term, on July 1, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the time period for bringing a facial challenge to a federal agency rule....more

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

As Online Sports Betting Proliferates, Authorities Tighten The Screws On Gambling Advertising

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP on

On May 14, 2018, the United States Supreme Court decided the pivotal matter of Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assoc., repealing the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992. The decision cleared the way...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That “Pure Omissions” Are Not Actionable Under Rule 10b-5

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On April 12, 2024, the United States Supreme Court delivered an important decision on the issue of whether a failure to make disclosure required under Item 303 of Regulation S-K can support a Rule 10b-5 claim, even in the...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Employment Flash - March 2024

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In this issue of Employment Flash: the new DOL rule on independent contractors, SCOTUS’s unanimous Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower ruling, plus labor law developments in California, Delaware, D.C., New York, the EU, Germany and...more

Dechert LLP

Securities and Derivative Litigation: Quarterly Update - February 2024

Dechert LLP on

As we close out 2023 and begin the first quarter of 2024, securities and derivative litigation continues to evolve. In this quarterly update, we examine trends in federal securities class action filings, which saw an uptick...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to hear oral argument on February 20 to determine timing for facial challenges to federal regulations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument for Tuesday, February 20, 2024 in Corner Post, Inc. v Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The question that the Supreme Court will decide is when a right of...more

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak

Eighth Circuit Rules That the Voting Rights Act Does Not Include a Private Right of Action, Impacting Potentially Numerous Pending...

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak on

On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act lacks a private right of action. The court affirmed an Arkansas federal district court’s holding that only the...more

Paul Hastings LLP

Public Company Watch: November 2023

Paul Hastings LLP on

In the November edition of our Public Company Watch, we cover key issues impacting public companies, including how to prepare for the 2024 10-K season; the SEC announcing a new intake system for Rule 14a-8 submissions; the...more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

Implications of and Open Questions Regarding the N.Y. State Legislature’s Passage of Bill Banning Non-Competes

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace on

On June 21, 2023, the New York State Assembly passed a sweeping bill (Bill No. S03100/A1278B — An Act to Amend the Labor Law, in Relation to Prohibiting Non-Compete Agreements and Certain Restrictive Covenants) that, if it...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

The Supreme Court Declines to Further Clarify Standing for Privacy Claims in Wakefield v. ViSalus

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. on

A number of federal privacy laws provide private rights of action, allowing individuals (or class actions) to bring claims alleging violations of certain privacy laws. Some examples of these statutes include the Video Privacy...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Reinstates Injunction Against Texas Social Media Law

Perkins Coie on

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s stay of a temporary injunction in NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, a closely watched case involving a novel Texas law purporting to...more

Miller Canfield

Supreme Court Holds Emotional Distress Damages Are Not Recoverable for Claims Arising Under Some Antidiscrimination Statutes

Miller Canfield on

On April 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., holding that emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a lawsuit brought under the Rehabilitation Act of...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies the Standards and Proof Required to Meet the Reliance Element of a Securities Fraud Claim

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued an opinion by Justice Barrett on the reliance element of a securities fraud claim. In a unanimous portion of her opinion (the “Decision”), Justice Barrett held that courts may...more

ArentFox Schiff

Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Narrows the Scope of the TCPA

ArentFox Schiff on

An April Supreme Court ruling significantly reduced the scope of communications platforms that could be considered autodialers subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The decision in Facebook, Inc. v....more

ArentFox Schiff

Class Action Quarterly Update: TCPA

ArentFox Schiff on

An April Supreme Court ruling significantly reduced the scope of communications platforms that could be considered autodialers subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The decision in Facebook, Inc. v....more

Foley Hoag LLP - Medicaid and the Law

The Availability of a Private Right of Action in Medicaid

Foley Hoag LLP - Medicaid and the Law on

A few years ago, we told you about the “ongoing saga” surrounding the ability of a Medicaid beneficiary or a provider of health care services to a Medicaid beneficiary to challenge a state Medicaid agency’s putative violation...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Address Major TCPA Issue Next Term, Resolving Circuit Split on Autodialer Standard

Hudson Cook, LLP on

Summer in Washington, D.C., is usually a quiet time. D.C.'s summer of 2020 has been anything but quiet, to put it mildly. While there are several existential pulls on our attention this season, we should still take a moment...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The Potential Impact of Terrorism Lawsuits Under the Antiterrorism Act on Ordinary Corporate, Banking and Sovereign Enterprises

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In the last 30 years, the U.S. Congress has enacted several laws enabling victims of terrorism to seek damages in U.S. federal courts. The central piece of legislation in this regard, the Antiterrorism Act of 1990 (ATA), has...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

US Supreme Court Strikes Down Decades-Old Statute Authorizing Copyright Infringement Suits Against States

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On March 23, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Allen v. Cooper, 589 U.S. ____, that the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990 violated the 11th Amendment by purporting to authorize private copyright...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Latin America Dispute Resolution Update – The Latest Developments in Cross-Border Disputes Involving the US and Latin America - ...

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

US Supreme Court Issues Trio of Arbitration Decisions - During its 2018-19 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued decisions in three cases involving arbitration matters. These decisions, discussed further in our September 26,...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Holds Antitrust Claims of iPhone App Consumers Are Not Barred by Illinois Brick

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On May 13, 2019, in a 5-4 decision in Apple Inc. v. Pepper, the U.S. Supreme Court held that consumers of iPhone apps are direct purchasers of Apple and therefore have standing to sue the company for alleged monopolization of...more

A&O Shearman

After Oral Argument, Supreme Court Dismisses Emulex Appeal, Prompting Speculation As To Court’s View Regarding Existence Of...

A&O Shearman on

On April 23, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as “improvidently granted” in a closely-watched appeal raising the question whether an assertion of mere negligence is sufficient to plead and prove a...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Punts (for Now) on Much-Awaited Class Action Questions in Frank v. Gaos, Remands for Standing

King & Spalding on

In Frank v. Gaos, the Supreme Court appeared poised to decide a divisive class action issue: whether settlement awards to third-party charities (known as cy pres awards) are valid. On March 20, however, an 8-1 majority...more

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

Supreme Court Hearing Raises Questions About Private Rights of Action Under § 14 of Securities Exchange

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes on

One of the more intriguing rulings of this Supreme Court Term is the Court’s one-sentence order yesterday dismissing as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari issued in Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian (No. 18-459). The...more

69 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide