News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Section 101 › Petition for Writ of Certiorari

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Holland & Knight LLP

Section 101 Patent Eligibility Roundup: Congress and DOJ Stir the Pot (and More)

Holland & Knight LLP on

Last week, Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Reps. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) and Scott Peters (D-Calif.) reintroduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA), a bill Sens. Tillis and Coons first...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Patent Eligibility: The Call for Supreme Court Clarity and for an End to Summary Affirmances

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has once again been urged to revisit 35 U.S.C. § 101, the statute governing patent eligibility. Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. (AED) filed a petition for writ of certiorari, challenging the Federal...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Section 101 Patent Eligibility Roundup: The PTAB, Cert Petition and My Oscars Picks

Holland & Knight LLP on

Dennis Crouch, famed Patently-O blogger, recently looked at several Section 101 decisions from the PTAB. In his first post, "Four Funerals: Recent 101 Decisions," Crouch analyzes four recent eligibility cases that involve...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Section 101 Patent Eligibility Roundup: October 2023

Holland & Knight LLP on

In this latest roundup, we look at some recent opinions from around the country, an interesting article discussing the constitutionality of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act, "My Cousin Vinny" and more....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Patent Eligibility at the Supreme Court: Another Petitioner Throws Its Hat in the Ring

Holland & Knight LLP on

In our roundup on April 28, we mentioned that the Solicitor General suggested that the U.S. Supreme Court grant cert in two pending patent eligibility cases: 1) Tropp v. Travel Sentry and 2) Interactive Wearables v. Polar...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Solicitor General Weighs in on Patent Eligibility Question

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Solicitor General, responding to a call from the Supreme Court for the government’s views, in April filed a brief directed to the proper legal standard for the “abstract idea” exception to patent eligibility under 35...more

Holland & Knight LLP

American Axle: After Solicitor General Weighs In, Neapco Responds and Court Sets Conference

Holland & Knight LLP on

I first wrote on American Axle back in 2019. Nearly three years and dozens of hits for "American Axle" on hklaw.com later, we'll finally get an answer to whether the U.S. Supreme Court will hear another Section 101 dispute....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Requests View of Solicitor General in American Axle v. Neapco

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court requested the views of the Solicitor General in its consideration of American Axle's certiorari petition, which asks the Court to reverse the Federal Circuit's decision in American Axle & Mfg. v....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Will 2021 Be the Year the U.S. Supreme Court Again Addresses Section 101 Eligibility?

Holland & Knight LLP on

In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Section 101 patent eligibility cases again, and again, and again. But is 2021 the year that the Supreme Court finally addresses the topic? Maybe. I'm hesitant to say yes....more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Another Section 101 Case

Holland & Knight LLP on

Those waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on Section 101 were, once again, disappointed this week. On Nov. 16, 2020, in the case of WhitServe LLC v. Donuts Inc. et al., case no. 20-325 (U.S. Supreme Court), the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

No Stay, But Please Fix

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a motion to stay issuance of a mandate while a petition for certiorari regarding patentability under § 101 was pending before the Supreme Court of the United States,...more

Haug Partners LLP

Will the Newest American Axle Case Create a Panel-Dependent Body of Law or Provoke the Supreme Court to Take Action? How the...

Haug Partners LLP on

On October 23, 2020, in a remarkable order demonstrating how a “bitterly divided” Federal Circuit views post-Alice patent eligibility jurisprudence, the court denied the motion of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. (“AAM”)...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Detecting Disease Is Not a “Tangible and Useful Result” Eligible for Patenting

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

The federal appeals court with jurisdiction over questions of patent law has consistently held that methods of diagnosing a disease or other biological condition violate the Supreme Court’s ban on patenting “natural...more

Hogan Lovells

U.S. + Germany Patent Update – July 2018

Hogan Lovells on

The prominent state of patent litigation in the United States and Germany is due not only to the size of its markets, but also to a recent increase in hearings before the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Patent...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Sequenom v. Ariosa

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Supreme Court issued an order this morning denying certiorari in Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. Patent Docs will provide more analysis of the Court's denial of certiorari in a subsequent post....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Certiorari: Dr. Chakrabarty, A Scientist's View

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In March, following the Federal Circuit's denial of Sequenom's petition for rehearing en banc, Sequenom filed a petition for certiorari for Supreme Court review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v....more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Ariosa Files Opposition to Sequenom’s Cert Petition

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Natera, Inc., and DNA Diagnostics Center, Inc. have filed briefs in opposition to Sequenom’s petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court for review of the Federal Circuit’s decision holding...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court Asked to Clarify Limits on Diagnostic Method Patents

BakerHostetler on

Arguing that the current state of the law weakens the patent system and poses a danger to life science innovators, biotechnology company, Sequenom, Inc., has filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Sequenom Throws Diagnostic Method Patents At The Mercy Of The Supreme Court

Foley & Lardner LLP on

It comes as no surprise that Sequenom has filed a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking the Court to review the Federal Circuit decision that upheld the district court decision that held its diagnostic method...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide