News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Telephone Consumer Protection Act › Remand

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
McGlinchey Stafford

Litigation Byte (January 2025 Edition)

McGlinchey Stafford on

Delivered in digestible, insightful bites, McGlinchey’s Litigation Byte is a monthly roundup of financial services decisions and cases nationwide that impact your business....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - July 9, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued the following decisions: Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, No. 19-715; Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG, No. 19-760: In April 2019, three United States House of Representatives’ committees...more

Vedder Price

TCPA Turnstile: As we wait for a ruling in Barr, new case law abounds (TCPA Case Update Vol. 12)

Vedder Price on

Undoubtedly, the biggest TCPA development in the last month was the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc., Case No. 19-631, which has the potential to upend TCPA...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Punts On Whether FCC’s Interpretation of the TCPA Binds Federal Courts

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

At the end of the Supreme Court’s most recent term, the Court released its long-awaited ruling in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 2051 (June 20, 2019)—a case that could have carried...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Leaves Uncertainty For Navigating TCPA Landmines

Amundsen Davis LLC on

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits unsolicited calls, text messages and faxes; it’s a federal statute that provides for statutory damages between $500-$1,500 per violation. With the speed and ease (and...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Sends Case Interpreting TCPA Back to Lower Court

Hudson Cook, LLP on

Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in 1992 to regulate how people communicate by phone and fax. The TCPA gave the Federal Communications Commission regulatory authority to issue rules expanding on the...more

Baker Donelson

SCOTUS Punts on TCPA Guidance

Baker Donelson on

In its long-awaited ruling addressing whether the Administrative Orders Review Act (Hobbs Act) requires district courts to accept the FCC's legal interpretations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the TCPA), the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Balks on Judicial Deference to FCC in TCPA Case, While Concurrence Led by Justice Kavanaugh Looks to Swing

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP on

TCPA litigators have been closely monitoring the U.S. Supreme Court's docket waiting for a ruling in the PDR Network case. At stake is what kind of judicial deference should be given to the FCC's interpretation of the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS Punts on Whether FCC's TCPA Interpretations Bind District Courts

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In November 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court had granted certiorari in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., to decide whether the Hobbs Act required the district court to accept the Federal Communications...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

The Impact of PDR Network LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on

Are district courts prohibited in every instance from considering challenges to the Federal Communication Commission (“FCC”)’s interpretation of certain provisions in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act – or can district...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Opens New Line of Attack on Federal Agency Interpretations of Federal Law

Perkins Coie on

In a recent decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal district court was not necessarily bound by the Federal Communications Commission’s prior interpretation of a federal statute over which the agency has...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court Leaves Open Issue of Federal Communication Agency Interpretation Of TCPA, For Now

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Dodging the question of whether the Hobbs Act requires a federal court to accept the 2006 Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Order that provides the legal interpretation for the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA),...more

Hogan Lovells

U.S. Supreme Court Sidesteps Important TCPA Deference Issues

Hogan Lovells on

On June 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in PDR v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic.  The Court was expected to provide greater clarity about the extent to which litigants can challenge the Federal...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc.

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, holding that whether the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2006 order interpreting the...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

BREAKING: Supreme Court Vacates and Remands TCPA Case to Fourth Circuit for Further Analysis

Womble Bond Dickinson on

It is a busy TCPA news day! The United States Supreme Court has released its decision in PDR Networks, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., a TCPA junk fax class action. The decision is available for download...more

WilmerHale

Supreme Court Vacates Ninth Circuit Decision in Spokeo, Remands for Analysis of Concrete Harms

WilmerHale on

On May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Spokeo v. Robins, which posed the question of whether Article III standing requires a plaintiff to have a concrete injury when alleging a statutory violation under the...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The Class Action Chronicle - Summer 2015

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In This Issue: - The Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2015 - Class Certification Decisions: ..Decisions Granting Motions to Strike/Dismiss Class Claims ..Decisions Denying Motions to...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide