News & Analysis as of

Section 337

When Is It Too Late to Amend an ITC Complaint?

by Jones Day on

In a recent order, Administrative Law Judge McNamara denied Complainants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint to assert U.S. Patent Nos. 8,760,454 and 9,582,846...more

ITC Clarifies Domestic Industry Requirement for Unregistered Trade Dress

by Jones Day on

The ITC issued an Opinion finding a violation of Section 337 and issuing a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Of note, the Commission clarified that the “domestic industry” for unregistered trade dress need...more

Federal Circuit Upholds ITC Exclusion Order

by Jones Day on

In Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ITC, No. 16-2563 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 28, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the Commission’s exclusion order entered in Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components Thereof (I), Inv. No....more

ITC Re-Opens Investigation in Response to Federal Circuit Reversal

by Jones Day on

In response to the Federal Circuit’s reversal of the ITC’s indefiniteness and invalidity finding, the Commission remanded the investigation to ALJ with instructions to issue an ID within 30 days....more

ITC Defers to FDA, Declining to Institute Section 337 Investigation

by Ropes & Gray LLP on

In what represents a departure from typical U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) practice, the ITC on October 27, 2017 declined to institute a Section 337 investigation based on a complaint brought by Amarin Pharma, Inc....more

ITC Remains Unpersuaded by Final PTAB Rulings

by Jones Day on

This week the ITC stood firm in its position that final PTAB rulings of unpatentability in IPR proceedings are not grounds to modify, suspend, or rescind remedial orders. In Certain Foam Footwear, Inv. No. 337-TA-567, the ITC...more

Looking Beyond Patents at the International Trade Commission—Is the ITC an Underutilized Forum?

by Ropes & Gray LLP on

The United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) is an independent, quasi-judicial federal agency responsible for enforcing Section 337 of the Tariff Act, a trade statute designed to protect U.S. industries from...more

ALJ Finds Violation in Mobile Device Holders Investigation

by Jones Day on

ALJ Pender’s initial determination in Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1028 (Sept. 12, 2017), finding a violation of Section 337, provides important guidance on what investments count...more

Chief Judge Stark Rejects Motion for Enhanced Damages Award Due to the Public Interest in the Accused Hepatitis C Virus Treatments

Last month, following a jury verdict in federal district court in Delaware awarding Plaintiff Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC $2.54 billion in damages—“the largest damages verdict ever returned in a patent [infringement]...more

Ding, Dong, the Witch is Dead

by Charles (Chuck) Rubin on

--Here lies the remains of the Code §2704 Proposed Regulations. RIP, 2016-2017-- As part of President Trump’s mandated review of federal regulations, the Secretary of Treasury has issued a report specifically recommending...more

Treasury To Repeal/Revise 8 Burdensome Regs

As previously discussed, the IRS and Treasury identified in July eight Obama era tax regulations that are burdensome on taxpayers. The next step for Treasury was to determine what to do with these regulations, and today we...more

Federal Circuit Stay Order Demonstrates Value of Redesign as Defense in ITC Actions

by Jones Day on

The Federal Circuit has determined to partially stay an ITC exclusion order as it pertains to products redesigned after the remedial orders issued. We have previously posted about Certain Network Devices, Related Software and...more

Respondents Sanctioned For Discovery Violation

by Jones Day on

On September 28, 2017, in Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products; Inv. No. 337-TA-1002, ALJ Lord issued the public version of her order requiring Respondents Wuhan Iron and Steel Group Corp., Wuhan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.,...more

Late September Surge at the ITC: Ten New Section 337 Complaints In Two Weeks

September closed with ten new complaints of unfair competition under Section 337, including patent and trademark infringement, in the last two weeks of September. Five of those complaints were filed within the two-day span of...more

Hogan Lovells ITC Section 337 Monthly Highlights

by Hogan Lovells on

The latest news round-up from our Hogan Lovells ITC Section 337 practice, including a new section featuring "tips from the bench" by former ITC Judge Theodore (Ted) R. Essex. Please see full Publication below for more...more

Implications of the 2016 US Presidential Election for Trade Policy

by White & Case LLP on

The election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States will have important implications for US trade policy. Assessing these implications in the immediate aftermath of the presidential election is,...more

Asserting trademarks and available remedies at the ITC

Trademark owners seeking non-monetary relief for infringement can turn to the U.S. International Trade Commission. The ITC offers a variety of powerful remedies pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended....more

Recent Case Highlights the Breadth of the ITC’s “Sufficient Involvement” Standard for Establishing Jurisdiction over Respondents

by Fish & Richardson on

The International Trade Commission (“ITC”) wields broad jurisdiction over unfair practices in importation under Section 337. The importation or sale for importation of an accused product “confers upon the Commission...more

ITC Issues Limited Exclusion Order of Diebold ATMs Following Finding of Patent Infringement

by Knobbe Martens on

Patent Judgments and Awards - On July 14, 2017, the International Trade Commission determined that financial services company Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. (“Diebold”) violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing ATMs and...more

When It Comes to Domestic Industry’s Economic Prong, Numbers Speak Louder Than Words

by Orrick - IP Landscape on

Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, Certain Radio Frequency Identification (“RFID”) Products and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-979 (June 22, 2017) (ALJ...more

Double Dipping Allowed in Domestic Industry Allocation

by Jones Day on

The Commission issued an Opinion finding a violation of Section 337 in Certain Air Mattress Systems, Components Thereof, and Methods of Using Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-971. Of note, the Commission reversed a part of ALJ Bullock’s...more

No Stay of Remedial Orders Even After PTAB Finds Claims Unpatentable

by Jones Day on

The ITC has dealt a significant blow to the use of Inter Partes Review as a defense to a Section 337 investigation. In an order issued this week, the Commission denied a request to stay remedial orders that are currently on...more

Colorable Difference Test Not Applicable to CDO Sanctions

by Jones Day on

A recent ITC enforcement decision highlights the importance of redesigns as an effective strategy for Respondents at the ITC....more

Instradent v. ITC: Federal Circuit Oral Argument Highlights Concerns Regarding Parallel ITC, IPR, and District Court Proceedings

On July 11, 2017, Federal Circuit Judges Prost, O’Malley, and Chen heard oral arguments in the appeal captioned Instradent USA, Inc. v. ITC, No. 16-2336 (Fed. Cir.), and, on July 19, 2017, issued a Rule 36 judgment affirming...more

Good News for Taxpayers: IRS Targets for Reform Burdensome Regulations on Partnerships, Corporations, REITs, Estates, and More

Earlier this year, President Trump issued Executive Order 13789, which ordered the Treasury Department to review all significant tax regulations issued after December 31, 2015 and identify regulations that impose an undue...more

180 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 8
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.