News & Analysis as of

Securities Act of 1933 › Initial Public Offering (IPO)

The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better... more +
The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better access to material information prior to investing 2) ensure that transactions are not based on fraud. In order to effectuate its dual goals, the Act requires that any offer or sale of securities is registered with the SEC. less -
Latham & Watkins LLP

The Latham FPI Guide: Accessing the US Capital Markets From Outside the United States - 2024 Edition

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Fabry-Pérot Interferometer, SA is a highly successful non-US company known to the world as FPI. FPI is considering doing a debt or equity offering in the United States. What are the key legal issues it, and its underwriters...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Grants Motion To Dismiss Putative Securities Class Action Against Apparel Company For Failing To...

A&O Shearman on

On May 10, 2024, Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a putative class action against a global footwear and apparel company...more

A&O Shearman

Eastern District Of New York Grants Motion To Dismiss Proposed Class Action Against Mobile Game Development Company

A&O Shearman on

On March 18, 2024, Judge Rachel P. Kovner of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissed with prejudice a putative shareholders’ class action against a mobile game development company (the...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

The Latham Global IPO Guide - 2024 Edition

Latham & Watkins LLP on

This Summary does not contain all of the information that you will need to successfully complete your global IPO. You really should read this entire guide as well as the other Latham & Watkins publications referred to in this...more

DarrowEverett LLP

SEC’s New Rules Give SPACs, Target Companies Much to Consider

DarrowEverett LLP on

On January 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted new final rules relating to special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”). The new rules affect both initial public offerings (“IPOs”) for...more

Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC

Rule 506 Offerings Continue to be Popular with Real Estate Companies

Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC on

Like an accordionist, real estate sponsors often seek to be innovative. Cutting-edge opportunities like crowdfunding and online selling platforms call to them. However, based on statistics from the Securities and Exchange...more

Cozen O'Connor

Final Rules on Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, Shell Companies, and Projections

Cozen O'Connor on

On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted the final rules intended to augment investor protections in initial public offerings by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in subsequent...more

Holland & Knight LLP

A Summary and Early Analysis of SEC Final SPAC Rules

Holland & Knight LLP on

By vote of 3 to 2, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) on Jan. 24, 2024, adopted new rules and amendments (SPAC Rules) pertaining to special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), with the stated...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The SEC Amends Policy on Economic Projections, and Issues Final Rules and Additional Guidance for SPACs and Shell Companies

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The SEC on January 24, 2024 adopted final rules amending the disclosure and registration requirements applicable to special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and shell companies that register or file reports with the SEC....more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

SEC Final SPAC Rules: Key Takeaways

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has finalized its long-awaited rules regarding special purpose acquisition companies (“SPAC”). So, what are the key aspects of these rules that SPAC market participants...more

ArentFox Schiff

Open Meeting Report: SEC Approves SPAC Final Rules in 3-2 Vote

ArentFox Schiff on

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler led an open meeting on January 24, 2024, hosting discussions that evaluated the potential benefits and pitfalls associated with the adoption of proposed rules...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

SEC Adopts Rules and Guidance on SPACs

Latham & Watkins LLP on

On January 24, 2024, the SEC adopted rules and guidance to impose a variety of new requirements on SPACs. The effective date of the rules is 125 days after publication in the Federal Register, an unpredictable process that...more

Goodwin

SEC Adopts New Rules Applicable to SPACs, Shell Companies and Projections

Goodwin on

We previously noted in our March 31, 2022 alert that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) held an open meeting on March 30, 2022 to consider proposed rules and amendments regarding special purpose...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

SEC Approves Final SPAC Rules

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On January 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved final rules relating to special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”). The final rules follow the SEC’s issuance of proposed rules on March...more

White & Case LLP

The SEC’s Charges Against SolarWinds and its Chief Information Security Officer Provide Important Cybersecurity Lessons for Public...

White & Case LLP on

On October 30, 2023, the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that it filed charges against SolarWinds Corp. ("SolarWinds" or the "Company") and its Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") in connection...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Greater Obstacles for Section 11 Plaintiffs Given Recent US Supreme Court Ruling on 'Slack Technologies v. Pirani'

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on

On June 1, 2023, the US Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision in Slack Technologies LLC v. Pirani that Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) “requires a plaintiff to plead and prove that he purchased...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Picking Up Slack: The Supreme Court Raises a Compelling Question for Go-Public Deals

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

The Supreme Court seldom takes up issues around the federal securities laws. But in June, it handed down an important decision involving Section 11 of the Securities Act. Section 11 imposes strict liability on companies when...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Ninth Circuit Clarifies Summary Judgment Burden for SEC Penalties

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On June 13, 2023, in SEC v. Husain, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit clarified the high burden that the SEC must carry before a court may grant the Commission a civil monetary penalty at the summary judgment...more

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints

The Supreme Court Solidifies the Securities Act’s Tracing Requirement For Section 11 Plaintiffs

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court solidified the “tracing” requirement for private plaintiffs to be able to assert Section 11 claims pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, holding that plaintiffs asserting such securities...more

Alston & Bird

The Supreme Court Maintains Limitations on 1933 Act Claims for Direct Listings

Alston & Bird on

Our Securities Litigation Group reviews the Supreme Court’s Slack opinion that upheld decades of case law requiring a narrow reading of Section 11 of the 1933 Act. The case addressed the scope of liability for claims brought...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

United States Supreme Court Holds That Section 11 Plaintiffs Must Purchase Securities Issued Under the Registration Statement They...

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

In Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani, No. 22-200, 2023 U.S. LEXIS 2301 (U.S. June 1, 2023), the Supreme Court of the United States (Gorsuch, J.) held that Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), 15...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Supreme Court Limits the Ability of Plaintiffs to Pursue Claims Against Issuers in Direct Listings

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

On June 1, 2023, in Slack Technologies, LLC, et al., v. Pirani, the Supreme Court unanimously held that plaintiffs alleging a violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) must plead and prove that...more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rules On Standing Requirements For Section 11 Claims In Direct Listings

King & Spalding on

On June 1, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that a stockholder bringing claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 must plead and prove that they purchased shares traceable to the allegedly...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The Supreme Court Clarifies Who May Sue Under Section 11 of the Securities Act

Paul Hastings LLP on

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani, holding that a plaintiff asserting a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) must plead...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Supreme Court Slack Decision Confirms Narrow Interpretation of Section 11 Claims

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The unanimous opinion requires shareholder plaintiffs to plead and prove that they purchased shares traceable to an allegedly false or misleading registration statement. On June 1, 2023, the US Supreme Court issued its...more

152 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 7
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide