No Password Required: CEO of HACKERverse.ai, Disruptor of Cybersecurity Sales and Most Other Things
Investment Opportunities in Italy's Tech Market
The SaaS Tacks – The Ins and Outs of Negotiating SaaS Contracts
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 430: The Paxton AI Founders Talk About Their AI Legal Assistant
CMO Series EP100 - Celebrating 100 episodes and exploring the future of professional services marketing
Medical Device Legal News with Sam Bernstein: Episode 10
PODCAST: Williams Mullen's Trending Now: An IP Podcast - Paralegal Insights: A Collaborative Trademark Practice, Series 3
JONES DAY PRESENTS®: Enhancing Trade Secret Protection in Remote Work Environments
Investigative Power: Utilizing Self Service Solutions for Internal Investigations?
Podcast: Unpacking FDA's Final Clinical Decision Support Guidance - Diagnosing Health Care
Software Escrow: An enterprise resiliency tool every legal department should have in their toolbox (with Don Dennis Jr.)
ASG LegalTech CEO Soumya Nettimi Talks Covid, Racial Injustice and The Future of Legal Payments: On Record PR
E8: Interview with Cookiebot CEO on Technical Solutions to GDPR Readiness
New Revenue Recognition Standard-Part III, Shaking Up the Software Industry?
Unfair and Unbalanced-Episode 19
FCPA Compliance Report-Episode 286-Use of Technology in Supply Chain Risk Management
Compiling Successful IP Solutions for Software Developers
Drafting Software Patents In A Post-Alice World
Polsinelli Podcasts - Hear How the SCOTUS Ruling May Impact Patent-Eligible Subject Matter for Software
IP|Trend: New Era in Protection of Software by Intellectual Property Law?
On April 30, 2025, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Fintiv, Inc. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. (No. 23-2312), issued on April 30, 2025, upholding the invalidation of Finitiv Inc.’s (“Finitiv”) mobile wallet patents related...more
Fintiv, Inc. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., No. 2023-2312 (Fed. Cir. (W.D. Tex.) Apr. 30, 2025). Opinion by Prost, joined by Taranto and Stark. Fintiv sued PayPal for infringement of four patents directed to “cloud-based...more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that a software term was a “nonce” term that invoked 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph (i.e., a means-plus-function claim element). The Court...more
Plaintiff brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,548,902, which related to online loan origination services. The defendant moved for...more
The case demonstrates that the eligibility analysis is highly fact-specific and dependent on properly construed claims. In McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc., a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...more
Figuring out what a patent is worth can often feel like black magic. But, doing so can be critical during an IP due diligence or when trying to assess the value of a company built around the intellectual property. In...more
JobDiva, Inc. v. Monster Worldwide, Inc. Case Number: 1:13-cv-08229-KBF - On October 3, 2014, Judge Forrest construed terms of four JobDiva patents and one Monster patent. The JobDiva patents are...more