News & Analysis as of

Substantial Burden Pregnancy Discrimination

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

What to Expect When The Legislature Is Expecting (To Reintroduce The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act)

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Hot off the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., recently, a bipartisan group of lawmakers declared their intent to reintroduce the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act....more

Poyner Spruill LLP

Supreme Court Issues Decision Regarding Accommodation of Pregnant Employees

Poyner Spruill LLP on

On March 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued an important decision in the case of Young v. UPS, involving a claim of failure to accommodate in violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). The PDA, which...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Forges New “Significant Burden” Interpretation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act

On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States settled a controversy surrounding an employer’s policy that provided light-duty work for certain employees (including some disabled employees) but not for pregnant...more

Miller Canfield

SCOTUS Pregnancy Discrimination Ruling Could Have Wide Impact On Discrimination Cases

Miller Canfield on

Employers should re-evaluate any employment policies that exclude –intentionally or not –pregnant employees from job accommodations, leave or other benefits in the face of Wednesday’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Young v....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide