News & Analysis as of

Unjust Enrichment Piercing the Corporate Veil

Fuerst Ittleman David & Joseph

Navigating Unjust Enrichment Claims in Florida: Direct (and Indirect) Lessons from CFLB Partnership, LLC v. Diamond Blue Int’l,...

A sometimes-overlooked factor in unjust enrichment claims is that the claimant must directly confer a benefit on the defendant—not indirectly, not effectively, not practically, but directly. The Florida Supreme Court made...more

Hogan Lovells

Manichaean Capital v. Exela Tech: DE courts rule on “reverse veil piercing” claims - Q2 2021 Quarterly Corporate / M&A Decisions...

Hogan Lovells on

In Manichaean Capital, LLC v. Exela Tech., Inc. (C.A. No. 2020-0601-JRS (Del. Ch. May 25, 2021)), the Court of Chancery ruled as a matter of first impression in Delaware that plaintiffs could pursue “reverse veil piercing”...more

International Lawyers Network

Protecting Confidential Information in Canada: Is there a Better Way?

The British Columbia decision Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack highlights the difficult, time consuming, and expensive exercise that organizations may find themselves in when an employee misuses confidential information. In...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Commonwealth Court Dismisses Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Lawsuit against Golden Living

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

Many nursing home operators have been closely watching the litigation between the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General (“OAG”) and the Golden Living chain of skilled nursing facilities. On March 22, 2017, the Commonwealth...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide