News & Analysis as of

Piercing the Corporate Veil

Royer Cooper Cohen Braunfeld LLC

Unaffiliate the Affiliated: Liability Considerations for Multi-Entity Businesses

Creating a robust business profile of multiple legal entities is a foundational strategy for asset protection and risk management within a larger affiliated business group. ...more

Jackson Walker

Texas Business Court Rejects Delaware-Style Veil Piercing, Enforces Texas’ Statutory Standard

Jackson Walker on

The Texas Business Court continues to show it will enforce statutory limits on entity liability and scrutinize early pleadings under Rule 91a. Judge Brian Stagner’s opinion in Lensabl hits three issues that frequently arise:...more

Ward and Smith, P.A.

Friend or Fraudster: How a Contractor Scam Artist Drove a Company Into Bankruptcy

Ward and Smith, P.A. on

When Maria Brown-Lindsey and her brother inherited multiple rental properties in North Carolina upon their father's death in 2013, they saw an opportunity. The properties could be rented more profitably if they were repaired...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Alter Ego Liability — Judgment Denying Alter Ego Liability Isn’t Necessarily “Collateral Estoppel”

The “alter ego” doctrine has been a frequent topic of posts on the Money and Dirt and LLC Jungle blogs... Normally, a court will treat a business entity and its liabilities as separate and distinct from its owners. The...more

Allen Barron, Inc.

Corporate Governance & Compliance Preserves the Corporate Veil

Allen Barron, Inc. on

Corporate governance & compliance preserves the corporate veil and is a duty of any officer of an LLC or Corporation. What is corporate governance and compliance, and why is it important to protect the integrity of the...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

No Right to Jury Trial in ERISA Withdrawal Liability Case Involving Veil-Piercing and Evade-or-Avoid Theories, District Court...

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

In Board of Trustees of the PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Pension Fund v. SMAC Hawaii, Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192966 (D. Haw. Sept. 30, 2025), the pension fund sought to collect over $610,000 in ERISA withdrawal liability from...more

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP

A Lesson in Corporate Veil Piercing Without Fraud

In a notable decision issued August 28, 2025, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, in Rich v. J.A. Madison, LLC (Index No. 150305/18/Appeal No. 4049/Case No. 2024-05929)1, affirmed a trial court...more

Ward and Smith, P.A.

Essential Strategies for North Carolina Creditors: Foreclosures, Fraudulent Transfers, and Piercing the Corporate Veil

Ward and Smith, P.A. on

Upon default, the initial instinct may be to rush to foreclose. However, taking time to evaluate certain factors at the outset can prevent complications and maximize recovery potential.  Factors to evaluate include...more

Butler Snow LLP

Veil Piercing, Revisited

Butler Snow LLP on

In 2020, when we last blogged on corporate veil piercing in Tennessee, we matter-of-factly said, “[t]he law in Tennessee on ‘piercing the corporate veil’ has not substantially changed” since previous blogs. Well, that’s no...more

Hendershot Cowart P.C.

Shielding Your Assets: How Texas LLC Owners Can Protect Against Veil-Piercing Claims

As a Texas LLC owner, member, or manager, you've made a strategic choice to separate your business and personal finances through a limited liability company structure. This critical legal barrier provides valuable protection,...more

Morris James LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery Refuses After Trial to Impose Liability on Parent of Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Morris James LLP on

NuVasive, Inc. v. Miles, C.A. No. 2017-0720-SG (Del. Ch. Jan. 31, 2025) - In an earlier decision, the Court denied defendant Alphatec Holdings, Inc.’s (“Holdings”) motion to dismiss, finding that issues of fact remained...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

US Parent Not Liable for Employment Claims Brought Against Foreign Subsidiary

The applicability of U.S. labor and employment laws to U.S. citizens working outside of the country can be complicated. In general, if the citizen works for a U.S. company outside of the country, they enjoy the same legal...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Court Affirms $1.6B Judgment in Bahamas Mega Project Dispute

A New York appeals court has affirmed a $1.6 billion award for the developer of a Bahamas mega project against various subsidiaries of China State Construction Engineering Corporation, the world’s largest construction company...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Trademark Damages: Supreme Court Rejects Disgorgement of Non-Defendant Affiliate Profits

The United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Dewberry Engineers Inc. v. Dewberry Group, Inc. on Feb. 26, 2025, clarifying the scope of damages available under the Lanham Act in trademark infringement cases....more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Using Construction Lien Law to Pierce the Corporate Veil: Court Upholds Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Officers of...

The corporate veil is a fundamental concept of American jurisprudence that generally shields owners and officers from the lability of the corporation. Unless the corporate veil is pierced or otherwise avoided, owners and...more

Sunstein LLP

Supreme Court vacates $43 million trademark award for violating principle of corporate separateness in Dewberry Group

Sunstein LLP on

On February 26, 2025, in Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated a $43 million damages award for trademark infringement, ruling that the lower court improperly conflated the defendant with...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

US Supreme Court: 'Defendant’s Profits' Are Limited to Named Defendants Under the Lanham Act

Under the Lanham Act, a plaintiff who prevails on a trademark infringement claim may be entitled to recover the “defendant’s profits” as damages. The Supreme Court in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc....more

Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP

The Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of “Defendant’s Profits” Under the Lanham Act

On February 26, the U.S. Supreme Court in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. unanimously held that an award of “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act in a trademark infringement suit is only ascribable to the...more

Jones Day

Affiliates (Currently) Off the Hook: Supreme Court Vacates $43M Trademark Infringement Award

Jones Day on

The Supreme Court vacates a decision treating a company and its affiliates as "one and the same" for purposes of disgorging profits for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, but leaves many questions unaddressed....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Want to pierce the corporate veil? Plead facts, not just factors.

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Only two months into 2025, and the Business Court has already denied two motions for leave to add claims to pierce the corporate veil. My fellow-Foxer, Brad Risinger reported here on the first opinion from Judge Earp in MD...more

Bracewell LLP

Veil-Piercing Update: Supreme Court Restores the Status Quo, For Now

Bracewell LLP on

The US Supreme Court unanimously declined to reshape the corporate veil-piercing doctrine when presented with the opportunity to do so in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc. On February 26, 2025, the Supreme...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

SCOTUS: Trademark Infringement Damages Award Includes Only the Named Defendant’s Profits

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated and remanded a damages award for willful infringement under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1117(a)) in Dewberry Group Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.,...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Separateness in Unanimous Dewberry Decision

BakerHostetler on

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Lanham Act does not permit courts to disregard corporate identity when awarding damages for trademark infringement....more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Supreme Court Overturns Nearly $43 Million Trademark Infringement Award Based on Section 35 of the Lanham Act

The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in the Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. case was released Wednesday. In a unanimous opinion, the Court found that Section 35 of the Lanham Act, which provides that a plaintiff...more

Allen Matkins

Alter Ego, LLCs And Choice Of Law

Allen Matkins on

In deciding whether to impose alter ego liability with respect to a limited liability company, a federal court has several possible choices.  It could apply the law of the state of formation of the LLC, it could apply the...more

139 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide