News & Analysis as of

Variances State and Local Government

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Appellate Division Upholds ZBA Determination Transferred from Supreme Court Pursuant to CPLR §7804(g)

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In 2017, 8 Bayberry Rd, LLC submitted an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Bellport (“ZBA”) seeking several variances to convert an existing three-car garage into a squash court and work out area...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Appellate Division Rejects Neighbor Attempt to Add Variances to Scope of Property Owner’s ZBA Application.

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Absent local legislation to the contrary, town and village zoning boards act solely as appellate bodies authorized to hear and decide appeals taken from decisions by local zoning enforcement officials (ZEOs) (see Town Law §...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Second Department Upholds Town’s Determination Allowing Property Owners to Build Hot Tub in Wetland Buffer

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Matter of Bernstein v Putnam Val. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, property owners sought to construct a hot tub on their residential property, located in a protected area known as a wetland buffer.  The Wetlands Inspector for the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Appellate Court Upholds Zoning Board’s Denial of Patio Setback Variance

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In July of 2016, Lisa and Robert Gerbino (hereinafter “Gerbinos”) made an application to the Town of East Hampton Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) for setback relief to allow an existing patio that was built without a permit...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Town of East Hampton ZBA Denial of 9.8 Foot Setback Variance for a Patio is Upheld by Appellate Division, Second Department

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In July of 2016, Lisa and Robert Gerbino (hereinafter “Gerbinos”) made an application to the Town of East Hampton Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) for setback relief to allow an existing patio that was built without a permit...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

State and County Laws Require Oversight of Certain Local Land Use Decisions

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As a “home rule” state, New York’s zoning and other land use decisions are typically made at the village, town, or city level.  However, Section 239-m of the General Municipal Law (GML) requires a referral to, and a...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court Upholds Village of Southampton Zoning Board of Appeals Determination

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Applicants sought to subdivide two lots located at 550 Hill Street and 554 Hill Street in the Village of Southampton into three residential lots with a 25 foot wide access easement along the southerly side of an adjoining...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Not Your Grandfather’s Nonconforming Structure: Mass. Appeals Court Clarifies Deadrick Decision, Discusses Difference Between...

Pierce Atwood LLP on

In perhaps a sign of the linguistic times, Appeals Court Justice James R. Milkey’s opinion in the case of Comstock v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Gloucester received more media coverage for certain racial history commentary...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Second Department Affirms Article 78 Reversal of Village Zoning Board Determination

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Petitioner, Claude Simon (“Petitioner”), owns approximately 2.25 acres of property in the Village of Upper Nyack (the “Village”), which he sought to subdivide into two separate lots.  The first lot would contain the existing...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Zoning Boards May Consider the Proposed Use and Purpose When Deciding Area Variance Applications, But Cannot Forget the...

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

When deciding an area variance application, a zoning board may consider the proposed use of the property and the purpose in seeking the variance. However, the zoning board cannot fail to account for the five-factor test...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Court Upholds Zoning Board’s Denial of Gas Station’s Area Variance Application

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Matter of Magid Setauket Assoc., LLC v The Town of Brookhaven Bd. of Zoning Appeals, the petitioners were the owner and the operator (“Petitioners”) of a Shell gas station located in the Old Setauket Historic District (the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court, Suffolk County Upholds ZBA Determination Authorizing a Change In Nonconforming Use

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Supreme Court, Suffolk County recently upheld a determination of the Southampton Town Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) perhaps ending a lengthy and controversial review of the development of a day camp on residentially...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Unique Procedural Rule Requires Transfer of Article 78 Proceeding to Appellate Division

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

A recent Second Department decision, Matter of Reddock v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, highlights a unique procedural quirk involving Article 78 proceedings where the challenge is based upon “substantial...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court Reminds: Schools are Special, but Not Exempt When It Comes to Local Zoning

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Residents of the Village of East Williston have prevailed (for now) over the East Williston Union Free School District’s plan to install a six-foot tall perimeter fence at the North Side School in the Village of East...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Connecticut DEEP seeks to Overhaul Remediation Standards– Widespread Polluted Fill

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

On July 8, 2019 the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (“DEEP”) proposed an overhaul to its Remediation Standard Regulations (“RSRs”). These proposed amendments, often referred to as “Wave 2, ” will...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Applicant’s Failure To Include Information About The Whole Project On The Site Plan Ends Up In Remand To Planning Board

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Warren County, John Carr v. Village of Lake George Village Board, demonstrates how a simple omission on a site plan approval application can upend an approved project, even though...more

Bilzin Sumberg

Florida Zoning Appeals Law: Miami-Dade County Special Exception Denial Quashed

Bilzin Sumberg on

In the recent decision of Publix Supermarkets, Inc., v. Miami-Dade County, Case No. 17-082 AP, the 11th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County held: (i) the applicant successfully carried its burden in a...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Finding That Zoning Board Determination Is Irrational, Arbitrary and Capricious, Suffolk Supreme Court Terminates Historic Deer...

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Recently Farrell Fritz, P.C. represented a family held limited liability company in connection with an application to a East End zoning board of appeals to maintain an eight (8) foot fence and six (6) foot driveway gates...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Federal Oversight of Zoning within the Fire Island National Seashore

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Fire Island is a 32-mile long, slender barrier sand bar island located between the Atlantic Ocean and the South Shore of Long Island. The island, which varies in width from as little as about 550 feet to not more than about...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

In Lease Case, Maryland's Highest Court Brings State Law in Line With FOIA

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Confidentiality is important for landlords and tenants in commercial lease transactions. For that reason, a recent Maryland Court of Appeals decision should be kept in mind when leases and other documents are submitted to...more

Nossaman LLP

Supreme Court Develops New Multifactor Balancing Test to Determine What Constitutes a “Larger Parcel” in Regulatory Takings Cases

Nossaman LLP on

Last week, the United States Supreme Court in Murr v. Wisconsin issued a key regulatory takings decision which creates a new multifactor balancing test to determine whether two adjacent properties with single ownership could...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Redefining the Denominator: Supreme Court Adopts New Test in Regulatory Taking Case 

In Murr v. Wisconsin, the US Supreme Court declined to find that a landowner's riverfront property was the subject of a regulatory taking. In a 5-3 decision, the majority adopted a new test for defining the bounds of the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court: State Law Merging Lots in Common Ownership Not a Regulatory Taking

Holland & Knight LLP on

In an interesting twist, eight members of the U.S. Supreme Court agreed on June 23, 2017, in the case of Murr v. Wisconsin, No. 15-214, that state regulations making two adjoining lots held in common ownership into a single...more

Robinson+Cole RLUIPA Defense

City of Bayonne, New Jersey Sued Over Denial of Application to Build a Mosque

Last month, Bayonne Muslims, a New Jersey not-for-profit religious congregation, sued the City of Bayonne, New Jersey (the “City”), challenging the City’s denial of certain variances needed to construct a mosque. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Can Zoning Stop Property Owners from Renting?

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Local governments may not rely on zoning rules to prohibit renters in multi-family housing developments. Many local governments (and residents) prefer property owners living in their communities rather than tenants. This...more

25 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide