Jill Rosenberg

Jill Rosenberg

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Discrimination

Share:

New York City “Bans the Box”—Inquiries Into Applicants’ Criminal Histories Now Significantly Restricted

On June 10, 2015, the New York City Council passed the Fair Chance Act (the “Act”), which prohibits employers from inquiring into the criminal backgrounds of applicants in the initial stages of the employment application...more

6/15/2015 - Ban the Box Best Management Practices Criminal Background Checks Criminal Records Discrimination Employer Liability Issues Enforcement Hiring & Firing Job Applicants Local Ordinance NYCHRL Screening Procedures

U.S. Department of Labor Advances Regulatory Agenda with Final Rule Barring Federal Contractors from Discriminating against LGBT...

On December 3, 2014, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released its final rule barring federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The final rule implements an Executive...more

12/12/2014 - Contractors Discrimination DOL Equal Opportunities Federal Contractors LGBT OFCCP Sexual Orientation Discrimination

An Attorney is an Attorney is an Attorney? Not So Fast, Says Second Circuit, Shutting Down EEOC Equal Pay Act Claim

The EEOC suffered another fatal blow to its systemic discrimination initiative on Monday when the Second Circuit held that the Commission’s Equal Pay Act (EPA) complaint against the New York Port Authority was too barebones...more

10/3/2014 - Discrimination EEOC Equal Pay Act Port Authority Sex Discrimination Wages

ENDA Prevails in the Senate, but Will it End in the House?

On November 7, 2013, the U.S. Senate passed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (“ENDA”), legislation that would prohibit workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The ban would join similar...more

11/13/2013 - Civil Rights Act Discrimination EEOC Employee Rights ENDA Gender Identity Sexual Orientation Sexual Orientation Discrimination Title VII

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects the Mixed-Motive Analysis in Retaliation Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court held on Monday that a plaintiff alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) must prove that retaliation was the “but-for” reason for an adverse employment...more

6/27/2013 - But For Causation Discrimination Racial Discrimination Religious Discrimination Retaliation SCOTUS Title VII UT Southwestern Medical v Nassar

5 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×