Bank v. ICOT Holdings, LLC, 18-cv-02554 (AMD) (PK), 2024 WL 278460 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2024) -
Pro se Plaintiff, an attorney, filed a class action lawsuit alleging that two calls he answered at his mother’s house...more
Trim v Reward Zone USA LLC, No. 22-55517, 2023 WL 5025264 (9th Cir. August 8, 2023) -
Plaintiff filed a putative class action, contending, in part, that three marketing text messages she received utilized prerecorded voices,...more
Perrong v. Montgomery County Democratic Committee, et al., No. 22-cv-4475 (E.D. Pa. July 18, 2023)...
Plaintiff sued Defendants, claiming that they violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s prohibition of making...more
Brennan Landy v. Vision Solar, LLC d/b/a Solar Exchange, No. 21-20241 2023 WL 4578993 (D.N.J. July 18, 2023) -
In this case, Plaintiff filed a putative class action alleging Defendant violated the Telephone Consumer...more
Drazen v. GoDaddy.com, LLC, No. 21-10199 (11th Cir. July 27, 2022)
Plaintiffs’ Claims and Allegations -
Plaintiff’s claims, and those advanced in two separately filed class action lawsuits alleging violation of the...more
Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, et. al., No. 19-511, 2021 WL 1215717 (S.Ct. April 1, 2021) On April 1, 2021, the United States Supreme Court released its much anticipated decision addressing the definition the phrase “Automatic...more
Elzen v. Global Strategy Group, LLC, et al., No. 20-cv-3541 (JPO), 2021 WL 185328 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2021) -
Plaintiff filed a putative class action, claiming Defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47...more
Lidenbaum v. Realgy, LLC, 2020 WL 6361915 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 29, 2020) -
Pending before the Court was a class action lawsuit, contending Defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 § U.S.C. 227 (“TCPA”)....more
Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., No. 19-631, 2020 WL 3633780 (U.S. July 6, 2020)
* Procedural History of the Case
Plaintiffs; political and nonprofit organizations seeking to make...more
7/8/2020
/ ATDS ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Barr v American Association of Political Consultants Inc ,
Cell Phones ,
Compelling Governmental Interest ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Content-Based Restrictions ,
Debt Collection ,
Exceptions ,
Federal Bans ,
First Amendment ,
Free Speech ,
Government Debt-Exception ,
Robocalling ,
SCOTUS ,
Severability Doctrine ,
Strict Scrutiny Standard ,
TCPA
Elizabeth Panzarella v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 18-3735, 2020 WL 3250508 (E.D. Pa. June 16, 2020) -
Two Plaintiffs filed suit relating to calls Defendant made when a relative’s loan became delinquent. Defendant moved...more
Whittaker v All Reverse Mortgage Inc.. No. CV 20-08016-PCT-DLR, 2020 WL 28229785 (D. Ariz. May 29, 2020) -
Plaintiff filed a putative class action, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. §...more
Vanessa Wright v. USAA Savings Bank, No. 2:19-cv-00591 WBS CKD, 2020 WL 2615441 (E.D. Cal. May 22, 2020) -
Plaintiff, who had a credit card account with Defendant for approximately 18 years, retained counsel to address...more
Medley v. Dish Network, LLC, No. 8:16-cv-02534-CEH-CPT (11th Cir. May 1, 2020).
Plaintiff entered into a contract, providing her cell phone number and expressly authorizing Defendant “to contact [her] regarding [her] DISH...more
Lazar Shcherb v. Angi Homeservices, Inc., 19-cv-367 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2019) -
Plaintiff filed suit against various corporate defendants alleging that they used an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) to call his cell...more
Ford v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., No. 18 CV 2695 (VB), 2019 WL 1046367 (S.D.N.Y. March 4, 2019) -
Defendant provided Plaintiff with a $300 line of credit Plaintiff used to purchase a laptop from Defendant. Plaintiff claimed...more
Plaintiff filed suit alleging Defendant violated the TCPA by calling his recently assigned cell phone number 140 times to collect debt from another, including leaving 4 prerecorded messages. ...more
Gaza v. Auto Glass America, LLC, No. 8:17-cv-1811-T-27AEP, 2018 WL 5775915 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2018) -
Plaintiff alleged that he received five text messages, asserting claims for violation of the TCPA. Defendant moved for...more
Wilkes v. CareSource Management Group Co., No. 4:16-cv-38 JVB, 2018 WL 4680028 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 29, 2018) -
Plaintiff husband and wife applied for health insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act through the Health...more
Medley v. Dish Network, LLC, Case No. 8:16-cv-3534-36TBM, 2018 WL 4092120 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 27, 2018) -
Joining a host of courts across the county, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida recently ruled...more
Harris v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 3:15-cv-546, 2018 WL 3748155 (D. Conn. Aug. 7, 2018) -
Plaintiff signed promissory notes to secure student loans in which she provided her telephone number, agreed to update Defendant...more
8/15/2018
/ ATDS ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Consent ,
Consumer Financial Products ,
Contract Terms ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Navient ,
Promissory Notes ,
Student Loans ,
Summary Judgment ,
TCPA
Few v. Receivables Performances Management, No. 1:17-cv-2038-KOB, 2018 WL 3772863 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2018) -
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. §227 (TCPA), prohibits calls to cellular telephones using an...more
St. Louis Heart Center, Inc. v. Nomax, Inc., No. 19-1794, 2018 WL 3719694 (8th Cir. Aug. 6, 2018) -
Plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit in state court, alleging Defendant sent it 12 fax advertisements without including...more
8/7/2018
/ Advertising ,
Appeals ,
Article III ,
Class Action ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Invasion of Privacy ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Opt-Outs ,
Regulatory Violations ,
Remand ,
Removal ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Unsolicited Faxes
Pinkus v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., No. 16 C 10858, 2018 WL 3586186 (N.D. Ill. July 26, 2018) -
Plaintiff filed suit, alleging Defendant violated the TCPA by, among other things, placing more than 100 calls to his cell phone...more
Both the House and Senate have proposed legislation that could have profound implications on TCPA litigation. The companion legislation introduced by Democratic Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. and Senator Ed Markey entitled...more
6/13/2018
/ ATDS ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Legislative Agendas ,
Popular ,
Proposed Legislation ,
Reassigned Phone Numbers ,
Regulatory Oversight ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Robocalling ,
Safe Harbors ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications
On May 14, 2018, in the wake of the landmark decision ACA International v. FCC, 855 F.3d 687 (D.C. Cir. 2018), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a Public Notice seeking comment on a myriad of topics...more