New Decisions -- Pleading Requirements for Complaints Alleging Contamination from Hydraulic Fracturing by H. Victor Thomas by King & Spalding on 5/8/2012 The development of natural gas wells using hydraulic fracturing technology—fracking — has grown exponentially and increased natural gas reserves to record levels. Hydraulic fracturing requires the discharge of significant...more
BLG Monthly Update, May 2012 by Neil Guthrie on 5/4/2012 Crucial commas, greasy chips and electronic contracts -- all this and more in the BLG Monthly Update for May 2012!...more
Apportionment in CERCLA -- No Bright Line Test by Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on 5/2/2012 The Lower Fox River Superfund site continues to pump out decisions on key CERCLA issues. Most recently, the federal court in Wisconsin in US v. NCR Corp. took on the issue of divisibility of harm in granting a preliminary...more
McAfee & Taft RegLINC - April 2012: Storage tanks By Chris Paul by McAfee & Taft on 4/18/2012 Owners of land on which petroleum underground storage tanks are located are responsible for the cleanup of gasoline released (In re Huntington and Kildare Inc. v. Grannis, N. Y. App. Div., No. 512100, 11/3/11). Huntington and...more
McAfee & Taft RegLINC - April 2012: Halliburton evidence on Deepwater Horizon by McAfee & Taft on 4/13/2012 BP accused Halliburton of destroying evidence that could be important in the litigation over responsibility for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (In re: Oil Spill, E.D. La., No. 2:10-md-2179, 12/5/11). BP questioned whether a...more
Essex Chemical Successfully Challenges NJDEP's Natural Resource Damage Suit by Cole Schotz on 4/13/2012 The New Jersey Appellate Division sides with Essex Chemical Corporation, a subsidiary of DOW Chemical, in a suit filed by the NJDEP in its effort to obtain both restoration and compensatory natural resource damages (“NRDs”)...more
Significant Rulings From the Deepwater Horizon Court on Discovery and Evidentiary Matters by Sedgwick LLP on 4/10/2012 The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana has been handling hundreds of consolidated cases (involving more than 100,000 individual plaintiffs) brought in the wake of the explosion, fire and capsizing of...more
CERCLA's Easily Confused Statutes of Limitations by Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on 4/4/2012 Deciding statute of limitations issues in CERCLA cases is not always a straightforward matter as the recent 54 page opinion in American Premier Underwriters Inc. v. General Electric Company illustrates. There, a federal court...more
Mississippi Federal Court Dismisses Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. by McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP on 3/28/2012 On March 20, 2012, a federal judge in Mississippi dismissed for the second time Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., a lawsuit by various Mississippi property owners against numerous oil, coal, and chemical companies seeking tort...more
The Chevron Ecuador Saga Continues as Second Circuit Overturns Anti-Enforcement Injunction by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 3/13/2012 In the latest U.S. chapter of the long and hard-fought battle over claims of pollution and adverse health effects from oil development in the Ecuadorian rain forest by Texaco (acquired by Chevron in 2001), a potentially...more
Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under RCRA: Testing the Limits of the Commerce Clause in a Citizens' Suit by Sedgwick LLP on 3/13/2012 Courts have traditionally construed federal jurisdiction of environmental statutes expansively, consistent with their remedial intent. However, recent opinions in Voggenthaler v. Maryland Square, LLC, Case 2:08-cv-1618 (D....more
Illinois Appellate Court Vacates Two Judgments Entered Against Honeywell for Failing to Produce Consultant at Trial by Sedgwick LLP on 3/12/2012 Officer, director, employee or independent contractor? The nature of a company's relationship with its consultant determines its obligation to produce that person at trial, an Illinois appellate court ruled in early February...more
Settling Party Barred from Bringing a CERCLA Section 107(a) Claim by Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger... on 3/9/2012 This week, in the case of Solutia, Inc. and Pharmacia Corp. v. McWane, Inc. (Solutia), the Eleventh Circuit held that a party that performs a cleanup in compliance with a consent decree has no right under the Comprehensive...more
Save Time, Money & Angst -- MEET and CONFER by Katherine Gallo, Esq. on 3/2/2012 The purpose of the “meet and confer” requirements set forth in C.C.P. §§ 25.450(b)(2)), 2025.480, 2030.300(b), 2031.310(b), 2032.250 and 2033.290 was for the lawyers to revisit their position, in good faith discuss a...more
State Supreme Court Revises "Two-Injury" Rule by Dechert LLP on 2/29/2012 The traditional single claim rule requires a plaintiff to bring at one time a suit for all the injuries arising from the same accident or incident, or risk being barred. In the toxic tort context, the...more