Civil Remedies Civil Procedure Electronic Discovery

Read Civil Remedies updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:
News & Analysis as of

Court Instructs “More Thorough Search” in Face of Irretrievable ESI (Kansas)

Neonatal Product Group, Inc. v. Shields, 2015 WL 6158810 (D. Kan, Oct. 20, 2015) - In this patent infringement case, the defendants filed a motion to compel against the third party counterclaim defendants. The...more

Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Appointment of Special Master for Discovery Matters (3rd Circuit)

Glover v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., 2015 WL 5947812 (3d Cir. Oct. 14, 2015) - In this appellate case, the court affirmed the district court’s appointment of a special master to supervise discovery, as well as the...more

CLIENT ALERT: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments to Take Effect December 1, 2015

On December 1, 2015, amendments to Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 37, 55 and 84 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will become effective. These amendments were originally approved by the Judicial Conference in...more

The E-Discovery Digest - October 2015

In This Issue: - Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product Decisions: ..Decisions Protecting Against Disclosure ..Decisions Ordering Disclosure Other - Spoliation Decisions: ..Spoliation Sanctions...more

Failure to Comply with Court Proceedings Results in Default Order (Illinois)

United States v. Alacran Contracting, LLC, 2015 WL 5829710 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 5, 2015) - In this breach of contract case, the defendant moved to set aside the court’s previous orders entering default against it based on the...more

Necessary Production of Documents Results in Award of Production Costs (Texas)

Mobile Telecomms. Techs., LLC, v. Samsung Telecomms. Am., LLC, 2015 WL 5719123, (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2015) - In this patent infringement case, the plaintiff contested a prior ruling by the court that held that the...more

ESI Discovery Best Practices, Part 6 – Now comes the bad news … potential consequences for inadequate preservation of ESI.

Over the past year, I have blogged about ESI rules and best practices for identification, preservation and collection of ESI. In this blog I want to focus on the potential consequences for inadequate efforts in any of these...more

Proper Litigation Hold Results in Denial of Sanctions (Oregon)

Grove City Veterinary Serv., LLC v. Charter Prac. Int'l, LLC, 2015 WL 4937393 (D. Or. Aug. 18, 2015) - In this breach of contract case, the plaintiffs filed a motion for sanctions in which they alleged that the defendant...more

Failure to Engage in Basic Litigation Hold Results in Sanction (California)

HM Electronics, Inc. v. R.F. Technologies, Inc., 2015 WL 4714908 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2015) - In this trademark infringement case, the plaintiff claimed that the defendants interfered with the plaintiff’s prospective...more

Court Orders Inclusion of Technology Specialist Fees in Award Calculation (New Mexico)

Gen. Protecht Grp., Inc. v. Leviton Mfg. Co., 2015 WL 4988635 (D.N.M. Aug. 3, 2015) - In this patent infringement case, the defendant alleged that the plaintiffs had infringed upon the defendant’s specialized patents,...more

AAA Issues Revised Rules for Arbitration in Construction Industry Disputes

The American Arbitration Association recently updated its Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures, effective July 1, 2015. There are six new rules, some of which are borrowed from litigation...more

Failure to Prepare for Litigation Results in Adverse Inference Instructions (California)

NuVasive, Inc. v. Madsen Med., Inc., 2015 WL 4479147 (S.D. Cal. July 22, 2015). In this conspiracy theory case, the defendants filed a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff engaged in...more

Court Grants Restraining Order in Light of Inadvertent Disclosure (California)

Newark Unified Sch. Dist. v. Superior Court , 2015 WL 4594095 (Cal. Ct. App. July 31, 2015). In this inadvertent document release case, the plaintiff sought injunctive relief against the defendant, requiring the return...more

Court Grants Sanctions In Light of Reckless Failure to Preserve (Delaware)

Kan-Di-Ki, LLC v. Suer, 2015 WL 4503210 (Del. Ch. July 22, 2015). In this breach of contract case, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant engaged in suppression and spoliation of evidence when the defendant deleted...more

Bad Faith Needed for Court to Rule in Favor of Spoliation Sanctions (Illinois)

Charvat v. Valente, 2015 WL 4037776 (N.D. Ill. July 1, 2015) - In this employment case, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant corporation had engaged in spoliation when it deleted certain files from its employees’...more

Failure to Comply After Meet and Confer Results in Expensive Costs for Reproduction (California)

Themis Bar Review, LLC v. Kaplan, Inc., WL 3397877 (S.D. Cal. May 26, 2015). The defendant served the plaintiff a request for production, seeking documents related to the plaintiff’s pass rate advertising and data...more

Court Finds Good Faith Submission of Costs in Accordance with Rule 54 (North Dakota)

Fitbug Ltd. v. Fitbit, Inc., 2015 WL 2251257 (N.D. Cal. May 13, 2015). In this trademark infringement case, two manufacturers of electronic fitness tracking devices disagreed over the bill of costs submitted by the...more

Court Affirms that Discovery Standard is Reasonableness, Not Perfection (Nebraska)

Malone v. Kantner Ingredients, Inc., 2015 WL 1470334 (D. Neb. Mar. 31, 2015). In this employment dispute, the plaintiffs moved for an order to request production of emails and invoices between the defendants and a...more

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Is the Discovery Problem Solved?

Long anticipated changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were approved by the United States Supreme Court on April 29, 2015. Absent congressional action, which is not expected, these new rules will take effect...more

Sanctions Motion Is Granted In Part For Counsel’s Mistatements

Stark, C. J. Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions for discovery misconduct, spoliation, and violation of the court’s September 18 order is granted in part and denied in part. Oral argument took place on July 22, 2014. ...more

The E-Discovery Digest - June 2015

In This Issue: - - Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product Decisions: ..Decisions Protecting Against Disclosure ..Decisions Ordering Disclosure - Spoliation and Preservation Decisions: ..Sanctions...more

Appellate Court Rejects Reliance on Document Retention Policy; Justifies Harsh Sanctions (Washington)

Crews v. Avco Corp., 2015 WL 1541179 (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 2015). In this wrongful death action, the plaintiffs sought discovery concerning the design and manufacture of a carburetor that was believed to be the cause...more

ITC Affirms Joint and Several Liability of Counsel for Payment of Monetary Sanctions Based on Client's Spoliation of Evidence

On April 30, 2015, the International Trade Commission issued the public version of its opinion reviewing ALJ Thomas B. Pender’s Initial Determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-883, finding the Respondents in default due to...more

New York court orders worldwide discovery from Spanish bank

In a recent decision that is now on appeal, a New York federal judge ordered a Spanish bank that maintained a New York branch to make inquiry of “all branches, within and without New York State,” for account information that...more

Recent Developments in Court Decisions on E-discovery Issues

The duty to preserve and collect data that may be discoverable once litigation is reasonably anticipated is well established. The following are highlights from recent Court decisions affecting the eDiscovery process. Although...more

130 Results
View per page
Page: of 6

Follow Civil Remedies Updates on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.