IP Update, Vol. 15, No. 4, April 2012 by McDermott Will & Emery on 4/30/2012 In This Issue: - Patents *Patent Applicants Can Submit New Evidence to the District Court in Civil Actions Under §145 *To Quote Mark Twain, “Reports of My (Inequitable Conduct) Death Have Been Greatly...more
Plaintiffs in Da Silva Moore Request Judge Peck’s Recusal by Cullen and Dykman LLP on 4/18/2012 On February 23, 2012, we wrote a blog post in regards to Judge Peck’s decision in Da Silva Moore, which ordered the parties to adopt a protocol for e-discovery that includes the use of predictive coding. After the order was...more
Recoverability of e-Discovery Costs in Federal Court: An Update by Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. on 4/18/2012 Last summer, we discussed the split of authority regarding the recoverability of e-discovery costs by a prevailing party in federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Generally, a court may award “[f]ees for exemplification and...more
Third Circuit Court of Appeals Limits Electronic Discovery Costs That Can Be Awarded to Prevailing Party by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on 4/3/2012 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently addressed the question of whether production costs related to electronically stored information (ESI) are assessable to a losing party under the applicable federal...more
Loser Pays Most Electronic Discovery Costs? Not So Fast by Morgan Lewis on 3/22/2012 A recent opinion vacating most of the electronic discovery costs affirmed in Race Tires II provides clarity in the Third Circuit as to the limited scope of electronic discovery costs recoverable by a prevailing civil...more
Recovery of E-discovery Costs by Miller Canfield on 3/19/2012 Costs associated with e-discovery can be enormous. That’s not news. What is news is the courts' increased willingness to award a prevailing party e-discovery costs under 28 USC §1920(4). The statute had been limited to...more
Recovery of E-Discovery Costs: A Vital Consideration from Beginning to End by Reed Smith on 3/13/2012 The costs of electronic discovery have traditionally been borne by the producing party. Even a defendant found free of liability could still be stuck with the bill for these costs. But a growing number of court decisions...more
John Doe v. U.S. Direct Ins. Co. Motion and Brief in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery of Plaintiff's Facebook Login Information by Daniel E. Cummins on 1/31/2012 Civil Litigators are well aware that there is an increasing trend in Social Media Discovery litigation in the Pennsylvania courts (and nationwide). Insurance defense counsel Daniel E. Cummins of the Scranton law firm of...more
Incontestable - December 2011/January 2012 by Finnegan on 1/26/2012 In this issue: Ascentive, LLC v. Opinion Corp., 2011 WL 6181452 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2011); L.F.P. IP, Inc. v. Hustler Cincinnati, Inc., 2011 WL 5024356 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 20, 2011); Marketquest Group, Inc. v. BIC Corp., 2011 WL...more
Be Careful What You Ask for: Loser Pays Prevailing Party Electronic Discovery Costs (Again) by Morgan Lewis on 11/28/2011 Following on the heels of Race Tires II,[1] which awarded electronic discovery costs in favor of the prevailing party, several recent awards suggest that when deciding whether to pursue litigation, parties should take into...more
A new landscape for competition enforcement: new challenges via e-discovery? by Gregory P. Bufithis, Esq. on 10/31/2011 By Athina Kontosakou, Consulting Attorney 18 October 2011 – Almost a month before the adoption of a package of measures improving the system of competition enforcement in Europe, we attended the 15th Annual Competition...more
In re Aspartame: Be Careful What You Ask for — You May Have to Pay for It — District Court Affirms Clerk’s Broad Award of... by Dechert LLP on 10/21/2011 The costs of eDiscovery continue to be a critical concern of clients and their litigation counsel. Even with cost-shifting provisions in federal and state rules, substantial eDiscovery costs continue to fall heavily on...more
Aspartame Assessment Of E-Discovery Costs Largely Affirmed by Dechert LLP on 10/12/2011 Last August we posted about a notable clerk’s order in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that taxed, as costs, several hundred thousand dollar’s worth of e-discovery expenses against the losing party in an antitrust...more
Monetary Sanctions Imposed on Counsel and Client for Discovery Violations by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on 6/29/2011 The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington imposed monetary sanctions on plaintiff Play Visions, Inc. and its counsel for failure to search for documents in a timely fashion, delayed and inadequate...more
Electronic Discovery Costs: Loser Pays (for what?) by Morgan Lewis on 6/20/2011 To what extent might it be possible to recoup costs associated with electronic discovery as part of a trial judgment? Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) gives the prevailing party the right to recover costs where...more