News & Analysis as of

All-Party Consent

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Supreme Courts Holds That Recording Cell Phone Calls Without Consent Is Unlawful and Subjects Recorders to Class Action...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Introduction - The Supreme Court of California, interpreting California Penal Code section 632.7, recently held in Smith v. LoanMe, Inc. that cellular or cordless phone conversations cannot be recorded by nonparties or...more

Troutman Pepper

California Supreme Court Confirms Call-Recording Statute Applies to Parties and Nonparties Alike

Troutman Pepper on

California Penal Code Section 632.7, part of California's Invasion of Privacy Act, prohibits the recording of a communication between a cellular or cordless telephone and another telephone without the consent of all parties....more

Kilpatrick

New Class Action Trend: Website Session Replay Tools Alleged to Violate All-Party Consent Recording Requirements

Kilpatrick on

“This call may be recorded for quality assurance or training purposes.” We have all heard the outgoing announcement while on hold. One benefit of this announcement is that this common courtesy is part of good customer...more

Perkins Coie

On the Discoverability of Virtual Meetings

Perkins Coie on

In 1964, futurist Arthur C. Clarke predicted that in 50 years, people “will no longer commute—they will communicate.” For a significant portion of the American workforce, the future is now. COVID-19 has fundamentally changed...more

Littler

Hit the Pause Button: The Implications of Recording in the Workplace

Littler on

Workplace recordings have made headlines in recent weeks. For example, Omarosa Manigault-Newman publicly played a recording of a meeting with her then-boss, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, to bolster her claim that he...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

The Privacy Perils of Employees’ Personal Phone Calls

California court: Employers unwise to permit use of company telephones for personal calls — at least if the employer plans to record those calls. Two-party consent means two-party consent: All parties to a call must be...more

BCLP

Bankruptcy Courts Closing In – Will An Agreement Requiring Unanimous Consent To File For Bankruptcy Be Effective?

BCLP on

We’ve all seen it. The business opportunity looks enticing but is laced with risk about a potential bankruptcy filing down the road. As bankruptcy lawyers we are often asked how deals can be structured to prevent a...more

Cozen O'Connor

Georgia Supreme Court: Insured Cannot Sue for Settlement Amount of Bad Faith Absent Insurer’s “Consent to Settle”

Cozen O'Connor on

On April 20, 2015, the Georgia Supreme Court unanimously held that when an insured fails to seek its insurer’s consent to settle a claim, the insured cannot pursue litigation against its insurer to recover settlement amounts...more

Laner Muchin, Ltd.

Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Illinois Eavesdropping Act's Two-Party Consent Provision

Laner Muchin, Ltd. on

Under the Illinois Eavesdropping Act, a person committed a felony when he or she knowingly recorded an individual without that individual's consent, regardless of whether it was reasonable for the individual to have an...more

Perkins Coie

Are You Recording Your Customers’ Calls? Better Listen

Perkins Coie on

Federal law and most states only require one party to a phone call to consent to recording it, which means the person recording the call doesn’t need anyone else’s permission; however, a minority of states, including...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide