News & Analysis as of

Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Claim Construction Generic Drugs

Harris Beach PLLC

"About" Patent Claim Construction: Par v. Hospira

Harris Beach PLLC on

The use of the word “about” in a patent claim as part of a numeric range might permit the patent holder to preclude competitor formulations falling outside the approximate range, as illustrated in a fairly recent decision Par...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Hospira, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

It has long been understood that claim construction can, and frequently is, dispositive in patent litigation.  This truism was the basis for the Federal Circuit affirming the District Court's decision against a generic drug...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - May 2018

Knobbe Martens on

Priority Claims Cannot Be Incorporated by Reference - In Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited, Appeal Nos. 2016-2707 and 2016-2708, the Federal Circuit held that when a patent for a...more

Knobbe Martens

Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co. v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals

Knobbe Martens on

Before Moore, Mayer, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary: Plain claim language will not be narrowed based on a patent’s specification unless the patentee clearly...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Vacates Infringement of Braintree SUPREP Patent

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In a divided opinion issued in Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court on one of two challenged claim construction issues and vacated the district court’s finding of...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide