News & Analysis as of

De Novo Standard of Review Lanham Act

McDermott Will & Emery

Just How Similar Must Competing Marks Be to Survive Dismissal?

McDermott Will & Emery on

After a de novo review, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court’s motion to dismiss, finding the competing marks sufficiently similar to avoid dismissal, and the...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Notorious RBG Spits Fire: BOOKING.COM Is Not Generic

Rivkin Radler LLP on

As is often the case, technology develops faster than the law. In that connection, courts are often called upon to apply legislation from yesteryear to technology which, at the time the legislation was passed, would have been...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The 9th Circuit Injects Some “Octane” into the Lanham Act Attorneys’ Fee Provision

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In the immortal words of the most recent Nobel Laureate in literature, “the times they are a changin.’” Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act provides that “[t]he court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

Appealing a Trademark Registration Refusal? Win or Lose, You May Have to Pay the USPTO’s Legal Fees

Proskauer Rose LLP on

The federal Trademark Act (the Lanham Act) instructs that if an unsuccessful trademark applicant appeals a refusal to register in federal district court, the applicant must name the Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide