News & Analysis as of

Directors Labor Code

Allen Matkins

Do Directors Avoid Employee Status Under AB 5?

Allen Matkins on

California's new law, AB 5, broadens the definition of "employee" by adopting the so-called A-B-C test for employment status.  Recently, I commented on the possible ramifications of classification of outside directors as...more

Allen Matkins

Is California Threatening Director Independence?

Allen Matkins on

Publicly traded companies need to know whether a director qualifies as "independent" for a variety of reasons. Item 407 of Regulation S-K, for example, requires issuers to identify each director that is independent. In...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Assembly Bill 2613 Seeks to Expand Personal Liability for Individual Managers in California

Assembly Bill 2613 seeks to expand the persons potentially liable to any “person acting on behalf of an employer”. More specifically, liability would attach when an employee is not paid sums owed when due under Labor Code...more

Allen Matkins

When Partnership “Members” Are Employees

Allen Matkins on

Last week, I wrote about how AB 2883 changes the definition of “employee” vis-a-vis corporate directors. See Is A Corporate Director An Employee Subject To Workers’ Compensation? AB 2883 also rewrites the definition of...more

Allen Matkins

Pay By Another Name Might Be Salt

Allen Matkins on

Yesterday’s post concerned the classification of directors and officers as employees for purposes of California’s workers’ compensation law. Effective January 1, 2017, California Labor Code Section 3351(c) will define...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide