News & Analysis as of

DNA United States Patent and Trademark Office Biotechnology

Knobbe Martens

Updates to the Law on Cloning

Knobbe Martens on

It was recently reported that China had successfully cloned a 12-year old schnauzer — the most recent of over 20 dog breeds successfully cloned by the nation so far. "Doudou" the schnauzer was cloned through somatic cell...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

IP Developments In Biotechnology And Trade Secrets

Ladas & Parry LLP on

2016 has been a year of IP changes and these changes have had an effect upon biotechnology as well as trade secrets. Patents: Will the U.S. Supreme Court Grant Cert. In Ariosa v. Sequenom? Ariosa v. Sequenom was...more

JD Supra Perspectives

Can we patent products found in nature? It's complicated. An update on Australia's Myriad decision...

JD Supra Perspectives on

It remains to be seen if this new Myriad decision in Australia will be extended as it was in the U.S. to prevent virtually any product found in nature from being patented....more

BakerHostetler

Australian High Court Rules Gene Patents Unpatentable

BakerHostetler on

Like the United States Supreme Court, the High Court of Australia has determined that Myriad’s patents directed to purified and isolated DNA molecules encoding the BRCA genes are unpatentable. Indeed, the Australian Court...more

Polsinelli

Billion Dollar Question Before the USPTO in CRISPR-cas9 Fight

Polsinelli on

A revolutionary biotechnology tool is the focus of an intense biotechnology patent dispute that will have far-reaching impact in coming years. The dispute is over the rights to the CRISPR-cas9 system, a versatile molecular...more

Troutman Pepper

Myriad - One Year Later

Troutman Pepper on

The Supreme Court decision last year on June 13, 2013 in Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics may have been a watershed moment for the biotechnology industry. So far the effects have been hard to detect, but...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Institut Pasteur Obtains Reversal of USPTO Board Decision of Obviousness of Eukaryotic Site-Directed Mutagenesis Methods

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Institut Pasteur v. Focarino, the Federal Circuit found that the obviousness determination by the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences was not supported by substantial evidence, and rested on an “erroneous...more

Akerman LLP

Post-Myriad Strategies for Claiming Biotech Inventions in the United States

Akerman LLP on

The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that genes or other naturally-occurring pieces of DNA are patent ineligible subject matter in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al. No....more

Baker Donelson

Supreme Court To Hear Oral Arguments in Landmark Patent Case

Baker Donelson on

April 15 is a big day for biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and medical diagnostic companies at the Supreme Court, as justices begin a new session by hearing oral arguments in a landmark case involving the patentability of...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Upholds Board Determination That Biotechnology Invention Was Obvious

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In In re Droge, the Federal Circuit upheld the decision of the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that found that claims directed to recombinant biotechnology methods were obvious. At 8 pages, the decision is one...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide