News & Analysis as of

Federal Arbitration Act Motion to Compel Motion To Stay

The Federal Arbitration Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 1925 that governs arbitration in contracts implicating interstate commerce. The Act applies in both federal and state courts. 
Foster Garvey PC

Arbitration Gets a Win: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski

Foster Garvey PC on

In a landmark ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court recently rendered its decision in Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, a case that carries profound implications for staying district court cases during appeals challenging denials of...more

Snell & Wilmer

U.S. Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split Regarding Waiver Analysis for Arbitration Provisions

Snell & Wilmer on

On May 23, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved in Morgan v. Sundance whether a litigant seeking to establish waiver had to show prejudice resulting from an opposing party’s failure to timely enforce an arbitration provision under...more

Littler

Kentucky Supreme Court Rejects Conditioning Employment on Agreement to Arbitrate

Littler on

On September 27, 2018, the Kentucky Supreme Court in Northern Kentucky Area Development District v. Snyder held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) does not preempt a Kentucky statute, KRS § 336.070(2), barring employers...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Chris Lazarini Examines Stay of Litigation in Simultaneous Proceedings

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini examined a case in which the plaintiff filed a FINRA arbitration against his broker alleging suitability, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, failure to supervise, and other claims. The...more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

When Seeking to Compel Arbitration, a Motion to Dismiss Is Sometimes the First Step

The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq., provides the usual means of enforcing an arbitration agreement by compelling a party to arbitrate rather than litigate. Thus, the FAA enables an aggrieved party to...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Plaintiff Who Could Not Afford to Pay for Arbitration Was Allowed to Pursue Her Malpractice Action in Court

Tillman adv. Rheingold Firm, No. 13-56624, 2016 BL 190432 (9th Cir. June 15, 2016) - Brief Summary - A former client who had agreed to arbitrate disputes with her lawyers, but ultimately could not afford to pay the...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide