News & Analysis as of

Fresenius Patent Litigation

Goodwin

Fresenius Kabi and Formycon Reach Settlement Agreement for Ustekinumab Biosimilar Candidate in Europe and Canada

Goodwin on

On March 18, 2024, Fresenius Kabi (“Fresenius”) and Formycon announced a settlement agreement with Johnson & Johnson regarding FYB202, a proposed ustekinumab biosimilar to STELARA in Europe and Canada. The terms of the...more

Goodwin

Formycon/Fresenius Kabi and Samsung Bioepis Settlements with J&J and Janssen Biotech regarding Ustekinumab

Goodwin on

On August 7, 2023, Formycon AG and Fresenius Kabi announced that they have reached a settlement with Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States relating to FYB202, a proposed ustekinumab biosimilar to STELARA®, marketed...more

Goodwin

Year in Review: Top Legal Developments of 2021 Impacting Biosimilars

Goodwin on

As we close out another calendar year, we look back at the top legal developments of 2021 that could influence the market for biologics and biosimilars. There were many interesting decisions and other developments in district...more

Benesch

Dialysis & Nephrology Digest - September 2020 #2

Benesch on

Fresenius launches suit against Gland Pharma over pain management drug patent - In a case before the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Fresenius alleges Gland Pharma infringed on its patent for the pain...more

Jones Day

SCOTUS Says “Fresenius/Simmons Preclusion Principle” Stays Alive

Jones Day on

The Supreme Court recently denied Chrimar Systems, Inc. (Chrimar)’s petition for certiorari seeking to overturn the Federal Circuit’s “Fresenius/Simmons preclusion principle,” under which Chrimar’s district court victory...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Hospira, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Hospira, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, 946 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2020) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Dyk, and Moore presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from N.D. Ill., Pallmeyer, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Hospira, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Hospira, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Civ. Nos. 16 C 651, 17 C 7903, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212916 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 17, 2018) (Pallmeyer, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Civ. No. 15-1102-GMS, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93911 (D. Del. June 5, 2018) (Sleet, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC v. Fera Pharms., LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC v. Fera Pharms., LLC, No. 15-cv-3654 (KM)(MAH), 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128126 (D.N.J. Sept. 20, 2016) (McNulty, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Levothyroxine Sodium for...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Court Report - March 2016 #4

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC et al. v. Mylan Laboratories Ltd. et al. 1:15-cv-00942; filed October 19, 2015 in the District...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Court Report - August 2015

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Ltd. et al. 1:15-cv-00539; filed June 25, 2015 in the District...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Ltd.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Nature of the Case and Issue(s) Presented: Plaintiff filed suit alleging infringement of claims 1, 16, 36, and 37 of each of the patents-in-suit. The patents-in-suit all claim pharmaceutical compositions containing propofol...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Ruling in Eastern District of Texas Sets the Stage for the Federal Circuit to Revisit Fresenius v. Baxter

Versata Software, Inc. et al. v. SAP America, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:07cv153-RSP (E.D. Tex.) - Versata v. SAP has been a dispute that the patent bar has followed with interest because it spawned the very first Covered...more

McDermott Will & Emery

IP Update, Vol. 16, No. 11, November 2013

McDermott Will & Emery on

Appellate Decision Sets Stage for Next Skirmish In The Apple vs. Samsung Smart Phone Wars - A unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has concluded that the district court was within its...more

Akerman LLP

Fresenius v. Baxter: The Importance of Timing in Patent Litigation

Akerman LLP on

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int’l, Inc., illustrates the potential value of challenging a patent's validity through administrative proceedings in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

BIO Urges Rehearing En Banc in Fresenius v. Baxter Int'l.

In a case that raises important issues of perhaps Constitutional dimensions (at least in Circuit Court Judge Newman's view), the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) urged the Federal Circuit to rehear the panel decision...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Patent Office Invalidity Ruling Trumps Court’s Validity Finding

A recent Federal Circuit ruling will likely increase the chances of obtaining a stay of a patent litigation if there is a concurrent proceeding in the Patent Office. ...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Just before the July 4th holiday, the Federal Circuit issued its ruling in Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. ("Fresenius II"). The Federal Circuit framed the question at issue as: "Whether under the reexam...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide