News & Analysis as of

Groundwater Supreme Court of the United States

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

A Shock to the System: Potential Ramifications of the Electric Energy Coal Ash Decision and Insurance Recovery

In what was likely a shock to coal-fired electric utilities, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held on June 28, 2024, that proposed decisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in January...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

SCOTUS Freezes States’ Efforts to Resolve Water Conflict

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

What Happened? On June 21, 2024, the Supreme Court narrowly held that three states could not enter a consent decree to settle their interstate water dispute without the support of the intervening federal government. The...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Draft Maui Guidance Memorandum/Clean Water Act: U.S. Small Business Administration Office of...

The United States Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy (“SBA”) submitted December 21st comments addressing the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) document titled: Draft Guidance...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Does Discharged Groundwater Require a Clean Water Act NPDES Permit? U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Issues Draft Maui...

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is issuing for public comment draft guidance on applying the United States Supreme Court decision in County of Maui vs. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. EPA had previously...more

Mintz

EPA's new Maui Functional Equivalence Guidance is guidance in name only as confusion continues to reign over the reach of the...

Mintz on

Just before the Thanksgiving holiday EPA issued draft guidance regarding when a discharge of a “pollutant” to groundwater is the “functional equivalent” of a discharge to a Water of the United States requiring a NPDES permit...more

Allen Matkins

California Environmental Law & Policy Update - 6.23.23

Allen Matkins on

3M announced on Thursday that it has reached a $10.3 billion settlement with many U.S. public water systems to resolve water pollution claims tied to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as “PFAS.”...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Almost 10 Years Later: Rio Grande Water Dispute Between Texas and New Mexico Resolved

Husch Blackwell LLP on

After nearly a decade, the Texas Attorney General and the New Mexico Attorney General announced in October 2022 that Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado had reached an agreement over the distribution of water from the Rio Grande;...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Colorado Meets Maui: District Court Analyzes Discharges to Groundwater

Maui has finally made its way to Colorado. In what appears to be the first application of County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020) in the state, the District of Colorado recently held that certain...more

Mintz

The Sacketts' second day in the nation's highest court is over. What's next?

Mintz on

This morning the Supreme Court of the United States heard from the Sacketts of Idaho for the second time. For sixteen years the Sacketts have been in the Federal Courts in connection with their attempt to build a house on a...more

Mintz

More on the Supreme Court's most recent tangle with the Clean Water Act

Mintz on

Bobby Magill of Bloomberg has published a concise summary of the two hours in the Supreme Court yesterday during which attorneys for the United States of America and the Sacketts of Idaho were grilled on the reach of the...more

Mintz

EPA's Science Advisory Board says EPA's definition of Waters of the United States is supported by science but will that matter to...

Mintz on

A little over a month ago EPA's Science Advisory Board decided "EPA could benefit from SAB review of the science supporting [EPA's] proposed definition of Waters of the United States.” As many of you know, EPA's proposal is...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Supreme Court Uses Emergency Docket to Weigh-in on Section 401 Program

Entities seeking federal authorization for infrastructure projects that may impact waters of the United States must obtain a Section 401 certification under the Trump administration’s narrowed Section 401 certification...more

Allen Matkins

The Still Murky Permitting Requirements Under the Clean Water Act after County of Maui Spawn Highly Fact-Intensive Inquiries

Allen Matkins on

In last year’s Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update 2021 Update, we reported on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui v. Hawai’i Wildlife Fund (County of Maui), 590 U.S. __; 140 S. Ct. 2778 (2020),...more

Jenner & Block

WOTUS to Get The SCOTUS Treatment, Again

Jenner & Block on

On January 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case on the scope and authority of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). The Court granted certiorari in the case of Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,...more

Troutman Pepper

Equitable Apportionment of Interstate Waters Sinks to New Levels

Troutman Pepper on

In a landmark ruling signaling a new lens with which to view the treatment of interstate water allocation, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision on November 22 in Mississippi v. Tennessee, et al., 595 U.S. ___ (Case No....more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Water Law Update: The Equitable Apportionment Doctrine: It’s not Just for Rivers and Streams Anymore

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In case you missed it while preparing for your Turkey dinner, on November 22, 2021, the United States Supreme Court decided 9-0 that the Equitable Apportionment Doctrine, which had prior to this decision been held to apply...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Decision May Affect NRD Trusteeship Determinations

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The decision could complicate states’ ability to pursue groundwater natural resource damages actions. On November 22, 2021, the US Supreme Court held that equitable apportionment applies to a dispute between states about...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Groundwater Pumping/Interstate Water Dispute: U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Mississippi v. Tennessee

The Supreme Court of the United States (“S. Ct.”) in a November 22nd Opinion addressed an original action the State of Mississippi filed against Tennessee involving an interstate water issue. See Mississippi v. Tennessee, et...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

EPA Proposes to Use Science to Identify Waters of the United States. I’m Shocked, Shocked.

Last week, EPA and the Army Corps proposed a new rule to define what constitutes “waters of the United States.” Déjà vu all over again. Under the proposal, the agencies: are exercising their discretionary authority to...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Mississippi v. Tennessee, No. 143, Orig.

On November 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Mississippi v. Tennessee, holding that water in an underground aquifer that flows across State lines is subject to equitable apportionment between the States, in similar...more

Stinson LLP

How Can We Chart a Course on Navigable Waters?

Stinson LLP on

Since the U.S. Supreme Court decided the County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund case in April 2020, the legal landscape of "navigable waters of the U.S." has eroded quickly. With Maui, the Supreme Court created a test for...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Catching Up on the 2021 Clean Water Act Releases

Robinson & Cole LLP on

The latest season of Clean Water Act (CWA) changes are now streaming from the courts and federal agencies. The Biden administration and lower courts have picked up where prior administrations and the U.S. Supreme Court left...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

Implementing Maui Remains a Case-by-Case Affair, at Least for Now

Last week, EPA withdrew guidance issued in the waning days of the Trump Administration interpreting the Supreme Court decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. As the masochists who follow the torturous case law we...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Does a Discharge to Groundwater Require a Clean Water Act NPDES Permit?: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rescinds Maui...

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) rescinded a guidance document it had previously issued titled: Applying the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Does a Discharge to Groundwater Require a Clean Water Act NPDES Permit?: Federal Court Addresses Maui Issue on Remand

The United States District Court (District of Hawaii) (“Court”) addressed in a July 15th Order the question of whether a Maui County (“County”) wastewater discharge facility (“Facility”) should have obtained a Clean Water Act...more

113 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide