News & Analysis as of

Harmless Error

McDermott Will & Emery

Jury Trial on Legal Issue Denied, But No Harm Done

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s denial of a jury trial, concluding it was harmless error because the defendant would have been entitled to a directed verdict regardless. Overwell...more

Marshall Dennehey

Appellate Court Affirmed Trial Court’s Determination That Erroneous Admission of Evidence That Defendant Was Terminated as a...

Marshall Dennehey on

The plaintiff, a nursing assistant, was sitting in the front seat of an ambulance that rear-ended a vehicle at a red light in poor weather conditions. The defendant maintained he was driving the speed limit, while the...more

Downey Brand LLP

Court Applies Harmless Error Rule to Validate Will Benefiting Ex-Fiancé

Downey Brand LLP on

Typewritten wills in California generally require the signatures of two witnesses to be found valid, but the harmless error rule can save the day. Probate Code section 6110(c)(2), as recently discussed, provides that a will...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

The Robins Kaplan Spotlight - VOL. 5, NO. 2 Summer 2020

Robins Kaplan LLP on

The Spotlight is the result of ongoing collaboration between our national trial practice and estate planning groups, with the goal of providing a forum to discuss the latest news and other issues impacting the trusts and...more

Lathrop GPM

Minnesota Enacts “Harmless Error” Rule Relaxing Formalities That Govern the Execution of Wills

Lathrop GPM on

On April 15, 2020, Minnesota became the latest state to enact the “Harmless Error” rule into law. The new law relaxes traditional formalities that govern the execution of wills and other will modifications created between...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: December 2019

Payne & Fears on

This month's key California employment law cases involve disability discrimination, wage and hour, and arbitration agreements enforcement. Doe v. Dept. of Corrections & Rehabilitation, No. E071224, 2019 WL 6907515 (Cal....more

Knobbe Martens

Failure of ITC to Follow Its Own Rules May Constitute Harmless Error

Knobbe Martens on

SWAGWAY, LLC v. ITC [REVISED OPINION - PRECEDENTIAL] - Before Dyk, Mayer, and Clevenger. Appeal from the International Trade Commission. Summary: Although the ITC must strictly comply with its rules, failure to do so...more

Knobbe Martens

ParkerVision, Inc. V. Qualcomm Incorporated

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summary - Before O’Malley, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: While obviousness of apparatus claims “capable of” a particular function may be shown by...more

Proskauer - Whistleblower Defense

DC Circuit Upholds SEC’s Denial of Dodd-Frank Bounty Award

On March 20, 2018, the DC Circuit upheld the SEC’s denial of a Claimant’s application for a Dodd-Frank whistleblower bounty award because the SEC did not rely on the information provided by the Claimant in pursuing an...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

CAFC Finds Harmless Error in USPTO Reliance On Doctrine of Inherency

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Southwire Co. v. Cerro Wire LLC, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO decision rendered in an inter partes reexamination proceeding that found Southwire’s patent invalid as obvious. Although the court found that the USPTO...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

United States v. Boyland, No. 15-3118

On July 10, 2017, in United States v. Boyland, No. 15-3118 (Kearse, Walker, Hall), the Second Circuit affirmed the conviction of former New York State Assembly member William F. Boyland, Jr. on twenty-one counts of public...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions: SC19516 - Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp. SC19516 Concurrence - Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp. SC19516 Concurrence - Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp. ...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Altera: Tax Court Invalidates Section 482 Regulation on Administrative Law Grounds

McDermott Will & Emery on

In Altera, the U.S. Tax Court invalidated regulations under Section 482 requiring participants in qualified cost-sharing agreements to include stock-based compensation costs in the cost pool to comply with the arm’s-length...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

US Supreme Court Makes it Easier to Bring Claims Against Police Officers

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

Last week, in Kingsley v. Hendrickson, the United States Supreme Court changed the law in the 4th Circuit, which includes North Carolina. North Carolina police officers will now work in a world in which it is easier for a...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Kingsley v. Hendrickson

On June 22, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Kinsgley v. Hendrickson, No. 13-1175, holding that to prove an excessive force claim, a pretrial detainee need show only that an officer’s deliberate use of force was...more

Carlton Fields

United States Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Case Involving Use of General Verdict

Carlton Fields on

Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Khan v. Chowdhury, Case No. 13-1479. Notwithstanding the denial, this case is notable, as it highlights a recurring issue in preserving error for appeal: proposing...more

Maynard Nexsen

Appealing Propositions: Appellate Issues In The Law - Distinguishing Between Error and Reversible Error; Recognizing and Avoiding...

Maynard Nexsen on

Right after the judge or the jury renders a “bad verdict” we all have undoubtedly heard, at least, one our clients say they want to appeal the case “all the way to the United States Court, if that’s what it takes to get...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide