Hatch-Waxman, FTC | JD Supra Law News

Supreme Court Hears Arguments on "Pay for Delay" Agreements

by Michelle Kim, Seth Mailhot | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 4/5/2013

On March 25, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on the legality of “reverse payment” or “pay for delay” agreements between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers....more

Par/Paddock Answers FTC Before Supreme Court

by Kevin E. Noonan | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 2/28/2013

Par PharmaceuticalPar/Paddock, one of the generic drug company defendants in FTC v. Actavis Inc. et al. (the "reverse payment" ANDA settlement case now before the Supreme Court) filed its reponsive brief last week. In it,...more

The Continuing Saga of Reverse Payment Patent Litigation

by Howard Ullman on 1/25/2013

In FTC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Supreme Court No. 12-416), the FTC unsurprisingly filed a merits brief this month again arguing that pay-for-delay (or “reverse payment”) patent settlements are presumptively...more

Supreme Court Grants Cert in Watson Pay-For-Delay Case

by Howard Ullman on 12/12/2012

On December 7, 2012, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in FTC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals. The Supreme Court is now poised to resolve the circuit split on the treatment of so-called “pay for delay” Hatch-Waxman Act patent...more

Supreme Court to Review Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements

by Kevin E. Noonan | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 12/10/2012

The Supreme Court granted certiorari Friday in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., one of two cases with certiorari petitions before the Court relating to reverse payment settlement agreements in ANDA...more

Home

Legal News

Find a Lawyer

Browse Subjects

Subscribe

Pro Services

For Reporters

Hatch-Waxman › Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court Hears Arguments on "Pay for Delay" Agreements

Par/Paddock Answers FTC Before Supreme Court

The Continuing Saga of Reverse Payment Patent Litigation

Supreme Court Grants Cert in Watson Pay-For-Delay Case

Supreme Court to Review Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements

Expand Your Reach