News & Analysis as of

Inadmissible Evidence Patents

Jones Day

“Voluntary Interrogatory Responses” Excluded As Inadmissible Hearsay

Jones Day on

While creativity has its place in advocacy, it can be taken too far. The Petitioner learned this lesson the hard way in Unified Patents Inc. v. American Patents LLC, IPR2019-00482, Paper 132 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 3, 2022). In this...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Expert Testimony Excluded Based on Inadmissible Evidence

McDermott Will & Emery on

Circuit Judge Bryson, sitting by designation in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, excluded a plaintiff’s damages expert opinion because the evidence relied upon by the expert was unreliable and therefore...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

ToolGen Files Motion to Exclude Evidence, CVC Opposes, and ToolGen Replies in Interference No. 106,127

In its turn, on September 17th, Senior Party ToolGen Inc. filed its Motion to Exclude certain evidence presented by Junior Party the University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

CVC Files Motion to Exclude Evidence, ToolGen Opposes, and CVC Replies in Interference No. 106,126

On September 17th, Junior Party the University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, "CVC") filed its Motion to Exclude certain evidence presented by Senior Party ToolGen...more

Knobbe Martens

Hurdles in the Admissibility of Source Code and Expert Reliance on Unauthenticated Source Code

Knobbe Martens on

WI-LAN INC. v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION - Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Source code evidence found to be inadmissible hearsay...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

CVC Files Motion to Exclude Broad Evidence; Broad Opposes

The latest installment in the cat-and-mouse game of deciding priority in Interference No 106,155 between Senior Party The Broad Institute, Harvard University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (collectively,...more

Knobbe Martens

Evidence from Non-Instituted Grounds Not Permitted in Final Written Decision at PTAB

Knobbe Martens on

IN RE: IPR LICENSING, INC., - Before O’Malley, Newman, and Taranto.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Establishing a motivation to combine two references for an obviousness determination in an IPR...more

Jones Day

PTAB Denies Timely, Relevant Supplement to Petition

Jones Day on

By rule, a petitioner may request permission from the Board to submit supplemental information in an IPR proceeding if: (1) the request is filed within one month of the Board’s institution decision, and (2) the supplemental...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Judge Chhabria Excludes Damages Survey Based on the Survey’s Reliance Upon a Rejected Claim Construction

On February 14, 2017, Judge Chhabria of the Northern District of California granted, in part, Apple’s motion to exclude the expert report of Unwired Planet’s survey expert, Dr. Allenby. Dr. Allenby was hired to conduct a...more

Morris James LLP

Various Pretrial Disputes Are Decided

Morris James LLP on

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 11-515 -LPS, November 24, 2015. Stark, C. J. The court rules on various motions in limine and contested provisions in the pretrial order....more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide