Income Tax Act

News & Analysis as of

SCC Grants Leave To Appeal In Guindon v. The Queen

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal in Guindon v. The Queen (Docket # 35519). In this case, the Supreme Court of Canada will consider whether penalties imposed under section 163.2 of the Income Tax Act...more

Enterprise Investment Scheme availability for film or television co-productions

HMRC has published a note to clarify the interaction between film or television co-productions and the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS). In the note, HMRC states that companies participating in a film or television...more

Legislative Update Report No. 2013-23 -- Dec 13, 2013

In This Article: Federal Government; Alberta; British Columbia; Manitoba; New Brunswick; Newfoundland; Northwest Territories; Nova Scotia; Nunavut; Ontario; Prince Edward Island; Québec/Quebec; Saskatchewan; and Yukon....more

The Crown Succeeds On A Motion To Strike A Portion Of The Taxpayer’s Pleading: Golini V. The Queen

In Paul C. Golini v. The Queen (2013 TCC 293) the Tax Court of Canada agreed to strike out portions of a taxpayer’s pleading suggesting that a protective reassessment issued by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) was...more

GAAR At 25: Panelists Discuss Lessons Learned And Challenges

On September 26, 2013, the Canadian Tax Foundation Young Practitioners Group (Toronto) convened a panel discussion titled “GAAR at 25: Lessons Learned & Current Challenges” on the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (“GAAR”) in...more

Unhappy Returns? The CRA Interprets Subsection 220(3) Of The Income Tax Act

In CRA Document No. 2013-0487181I7 “Extension of the reassessment period” (July 12, 2013), the CRA was asked to provide its views on the operation of subsection 220(3) of the Income Tax Act. ...more

Take A Chance: Judicial Review Of The CRA’s Discretionary Power Under S. 152(4.2) Of The Income Tax Act

In Radonjic v. The Queen (2013 FC 916), the taxpayer brought an application for judicial review of the CRA’s refusal to make certain adjustments to the taxpayer’s tax returns after the normal reassessment period had...more

Out With The Old, In With The New: Clearwater Seafoods Holdings Trust V. The Queen

In the recent decision in Clearwater Seafoods Holdings Trust (2013 FCA 180), the Federal Court of Appeal considered the scope and purpose of Rule 29(1) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) (the “Rules”). When...more

Foreign Affiliate and Other Tax Changes Proposed

On July 12, 2013, federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty released legislative proposals (the Proposals) affecting certain international tax rules in the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the ITA) and the Regulations under the ITA. The...more

Daishowa-Marubeni: A Tree Fell In The Forest And The SCC Caught It!

In Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd. v. The Queen, 2013 SCC 29, Justice Rothstein marries tax philosophy and tax practice by asking and answering the question: If a tree falls in the forest and you are not around to...more

Federal Court Of Appeal Deals A Blow To The Canada Revenue Agency: Full Disclosure Must Be Made On Ex Parte Applications

On February 21, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal released two decisions related to the obligations of the Minister of National Revenue when making ex parte applications under subsection 231.2(3) of the Income Tax Act (the...more

A Pointed Observation By The Federal Court Of Appeal On The CRA’s Approach To Proposed Legislation

The recent Federal Court of Appeal decision of Edwards v. The Queen (2012 FCA 330) includes an interesting observation dealing with the Canada Revenue Agency’s policy with respect to proposed legislation....more

12 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1