News & Analysis as of

Legislative History

Goodwin

Luxembourg Proposes Updates to Blockchain Laws

Goodwin on

On 24 July 2024, the Ministry of Finance proposed Blockchain Bill IV, which will offer greater flexibility and legal certainty for issuers using Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). The Bill will update three of Luxembourg’s...more

Benesch

Retailers: Beware Legislator and Regulator Junk Fee Focus

Benesch on

For many months, Joe Biden has been leading the so-called war on junk fees, a campaign to restrict surcharges spanning across industries - from airline seating upcharges, to hotel resort fees, to extra service charges tacked...more

Miller Canfield

Can Legislative History Restore a Repealed IRC Provision?

Miller Canfield on

Altria Group, Inc. v. United States, a federal income tax case pending in federal district court in Virginia, shows the importance of laying groundwork for litigation long before a complaint is filed. At issue is a difficult...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

OSH Law Primer, Part II: Creating Standards and Regulations

This series of articles is intended to provide the reader with a very high-level overview of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and how both influence...more

WilmerHale

California Looks to Amend Data Broker Law

WilmerHale on

The state of California is on the verge of amending its current data broker law with Senate Bill 362, also known as the Delete Act (“the Act”). The Act passed in the Assembly’s Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection and...more

Goodwin

In re Cellect: Federal Circuit Opens New Path for Double Patenting Challenges

Goodwin on

On August 28, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in In re Cellect (No. 22-1293) that answered a longstanding question regarding the relationship between Obvious-Type Double...more

WilmerHale

Patent Term Adjustments in Jeopardy After In re Cellect

WilmerHale on

This week’s Federal Circuit decision confirms that term-adjusted patents can be invalidated by earlier-expiring patents in the same patent family under the obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) doctrine. This ruling is...more

WilmerHale

India Passes Long Awaited Privacy Law

WilmerHale on

On August 9, 2023, India passed a data protection law that will govern how entities who process users’ personal data. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (“the Act”) will establish guardrails for how organizations should...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Ninth Circuit Clarifies Standard for “Client Employer” Liability

On June 1, 2023, a panel of judges for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that berry distributors were not liable as “client-employers” of agricultural workers. The plaintiff agricultural workers...more

BCLP

Pay Transparency and Equity Issues

BCLP on

History of Pay Inequality - Pay discrimination is not new in the United States. In 1963, Congress enacted the Equal Pay Act to address a centuries-old problem of sex-based discrimination in the payment of wages by...more

Holland & Knight LLP

The "Inevitable Disclosure" Doctrine and the DTSA

Holland & Knight LLP on

The "inevitable disclosure" doctrine permits the plaintiff in a trade secrets case to establish threatened misappropriation by showing that the defendant's new employment will inevitably lead the defendant to rely on the...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Global Legal Insights: Bribery & Corruption, 10th Edition - China

Latham & Watkins LLP on

China’s anti-corruption laws have been stringent for many years. On 1 January 1980, the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC Criminal Law”) containing the criminal offences of bribery and corruption came...more

Holland & Knight LLP

FinCEN Releases Proposed Regulations for Accessing, Safeguarding Beneficial Owner Information

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued proposed regulations (Proposed Regulations) on Dec. 15, 2022, governing the disclosure, access and safeguarding of beneficial...more

Goodwin

Federal Trade Commission Issues Expansive New Policy Statement Regarding Enforcement Powers under Section 5 of the FTC Act

Goodwin on

On November 10, 2022 (following its January 2021 withdrawal of its 2015 policy statement regarding enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act), the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “the Commission”) issued a new statement...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

How Different Judicial Notice Rules Can Change an Outcome

Judicial notice is one of the less glamorous parts of motion practice. A request for judicial notice is typically a lower-priority background document, drafted towards the end of the brief-writing process, along with a notice...more

Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC

Interpreting Laws–Why It’s Harder Than It Looks

Legal Interpretation and Construction - Clients frequently ask their attorney to tell them what the law says about a situation. They view the attorney as little more than a translator from legalese into English. However,...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week at the Ninth: Sand Dredgers and the Duty to Defend

This week, we take a look at a decision addressing the proper reading of “because” in federal discrimination statutes, and another addressing a California law precluding insurers from covering defense costs in litigation...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Defense Options After Calif. High Court Call-Recording Ruling

On April 1, the California Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. LoanMe Inc. that California Penal Code Section 632.7 prohibits both parties to a communication and nonparties, such as an individual who covertly intercepts and...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

California Supreme Court Increases Privacy Protections for Covered Cellular Communications

The California Supreme Court overturned the California Court of Appeals to hold that a party to a phone call can violate California Penal Code section 632.7 by recording the conversation without the consent of the other...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Turkey’s Majority State-Owned Halkbank Is Not Immune from U.S. Prosecution in Iran Sanctions and Money Laundering Case

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Court Rejects Halkbank’s Claim That the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Shields the Bank From Prosecution - A motion to dismiss an indictment accusing Turkey’s majority state-owned Halkbank of money laundering, bank...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Sixth Circuit widens circuit split over TCPA autodialer definition

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In Allan v. Pa. Higher Educ. Assistance Agency, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (TCPA) statutory definition of an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”)...more

Nossaman LLP

California Supreme Court Determines That Legal Issues Motions Cannot Be Made in Inverse Condemnation Actions

Nossaman LLP on

It is Christmas in July for eminent domain practitioners! We have a California Supreme Court opinion on a condemnation case, which is rare. The case, Weiss v. People ex rel. Department of Transportation (2020 Cal. LEXIS...more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

28 U.S.C. §1782(a): Second Circuit Reinforces Appeals Court Split Concerning Applicability to Private Commercial Arbitrations

Just as the jurisprudential pendulum appeared to be swinging smoothly in one direction, the Second Circuit declined to get on board and instead pushed back to the future on July 8, 2020 in holding that federal courts may not...more

Knobbe Martens

$5 Million Attorneys’ Fee Award Affirmed Because Government’s Litigation Position Not Substantially Justified

Knobbe Martens on

HITKANSUT LLC V. UNITED STATES - Before Prost, Clevenger, and Moore. Appeal from the Court of Federal Claims. Summary: Fee-shifting under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), turns on whether “the position of the United States was...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

U.S. Circuit Rulings Complicate Key International Arbitration Decisions

In regard to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a), U.S. circuit courts split on what qualifies as a “foreign or international tribunal.” The breadth of U.S. discovery in foreign international arbitrations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a)...more

95 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide