News & Analysis as of

Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act Fraud

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Counterfeiting: Why Crime Doesn’t Pay

Based on a recent restitution submission prepared by Faegre Drinker, a federal judge in Harrisburg, Pa. awarded Eli Lilly and Company $1.9 million in restitution from an individual convicted of trafficking in drugs bearing...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Supreme Court Narrows Ability to Recover Internal Investigation Costs

McGuireWoods LLP on

In January, this blog previewed the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Lagos v. United States to resolve a circuit split regarding whether companies could recover costs of internal investigations under the Mandatory...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Lagos v. United States

On May 29, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Lagos v. United States, No. 16-1519, holding that the federal law making restitution to victims of certain federal crimes mandatory does not apply to victims’...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Government Failure to Prove Actual Losses Means No Restitution to Victims under Restitution Act, Court Rules

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 provides that defendants convicted of crimes committed by “fraud or deceit” must compensate victims for the full amount of their losses. A question that courts often face is...more

Perkins Coie

Weighing The Price Of Crime — Apportioning Restitution Based On Relative Fault

Perkins Coie on

Criminal justice practitioners understand that ‘‘joint and several liability’’ stands for the common proposition that each co-conspirator should be equally responsible for all provable losses the conspiracy caused. Put...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide