News & Analysis as of

Material Nonpublic Information

SEC, USAO Charge Four With Insider Trading Tied to Political Intelligence

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Commission resolved an earlier action against a political intelligence firm that had ties to the Centers for Medicare & Medicate Services or CMS by requiring admissions, a cease and desist order and revamped compliance...more

SEC, Cooperman Settle Insider Trading Claims

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Commission settled its hotly contested insider trading case against well-known hedge fund manager, Leon Cooperman. SEC v. Cooperman (E.D. Pa. Filed Sept. 21, 2016)....more

This Week In Securities Litigation

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court heard argument this week in a case that may have a significant impact on remedies in SEC enforcement actions. In Kokesh v. SEC the High Court is considering whether the five year statute of limitations it...more

FINRA Dismisses Insider Trading Charges

by Shearman & Sterling LLP on

On March 13, 2017, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (“FINRA”) National Adjudicatory Council (the “NAC”) affirmed a hearing panel’s finding that Matthew Joseph Sheerin, a trader formerly with investment firm Angelo...more

SEC Fines Broker-Dealer for Inadequate Information Barriers

by Dechert LLP on

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 13, 2017, issued a cease and desist order (Order) and imposed a $100,000 civil penalty against broker-dealer Sidoti & Company, LLC (Broker-Dealer), to settle...more

Watch the Napkin: First Circuit Affirms Insider-Trading Conviction

In what appears to be the first appellate decision since the Supreme Court’s December 2016 ruling in Salman v. United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed an insider-trading conviction based on a...more

SEC Sanctions Broker For No Procedures and then Inadequate Procedures

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Commission has brought an increasing number of enforcement actions focused on either a failure to comply with firm procedures or for inadequate procedures. In many instances the actions arise from inspections by OCIE. The...more

Insider Trading and Related Risks for Executive Branch Employees: Pay Attention to the STOCK Act

by Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

As a new administration arrives in the nation’s capital amid heightened scrutiny over conflicts between government service and personal business interests, a little-used law — the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act...more

Intertwining allegations and information… the case of the misused password

by Dentons on

In the case of Eiger Securities LLP v. Korshunova UKEAT/0149/16 the EAT considered what amounted to a protected disclosure when bringing a whistleblowing claim. ...more

Securities Group News: New Guidance on “Personal Benefit” Test of Insider Trading Law

by Murtha Cullina on

For the first time in nearly two decades, the United States Supreme Court has directly addressed the scope of insider trading liability under the federal securities laws. The Court in Salman v. United States considered...more

Bridging the Week - January 2017

Jon Corzine Agrees to US $5 Million Fine and Registration Ban to Settle CFTC Charges Related to Collapse of MF Global; Edith O’Brien to Pay US $500,000: Jon Corzine agreed to resolve charges brought by the Commodity Futures...more

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Broader View of “Personal Benefits” That Can Trigger Insider-Trading Liability

by Miller Canfield on

To be liable for insider trading in violation of the federal securities laws, the insider “tipper” who discloses the inside information must personally benefit, directly or indirectly, from his disclosure to a “tippee” who...more

Supreme Court Revisits Insider-Trading Liability

by Latham & Watkins LLP on

Salman reaffirms Dirks and holds that a “gift” of inside information to a trading relative or friend continues to meet the personal-benefit requirement. The Salman Prosecution - In 2011, Bassam Yacoub Salman was...more

United States v. Salman: Supreme Court Reaffirms “Friends With Benefits” Test In Insider Trading Cases

On December 6, 2016, in an opinion written by Justice Alito, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Salman v. United States, a closely-watched insider trading tipping case. Salman builds upon...more

The Supreme Court Reaffirms Dirks in Salman

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On December 6th, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first major decision on insider trading in over 20 years, and affirmed the conviction of Bassam Salman for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of...more

Supreme Court Affirms That Pecuniary Benefit Not Required For Family Member Tips, But Declines to Address What Constitutes a...

by Shearman & Sterling LLP on

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous, but narrow, ruling in Salman v. United States, regarding criminal tipper/tippee liability for insider trading, which the Supreme Court had not significantly...more

What is a personal benefit? US Supreme Court issues major insider trading decision - key takeaways

by DLA Piper on

On December 6th, Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its first insider trading decision in more than two decades, Salman v. United States. The decision clarified uncertainty in insider trading prosecutions that arose...more

Government Prevails in Significant Insider Trading Case

On December 6, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued one of its most significant rulings on insider trading in recent years. In its ruling in Salman v. United States, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld Bassam Yacoub Salman’s...more

Supreme Court Opens Pathway To Increased Insider Trading Prosecutions

On Dec. 6, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-awaited decision in Salman v. United States, upholding a “friends and family” insider-trading conviction and effectively overruling the Second Circuit’s decision in...more

Unanimous Supreme Court Rejects Effort to Cut Back Insider Trading Liability

by Bryan Cave on

The U.S. Supreme Court earlier today rejected an attempt to cut back on liability for insider trading where people give inside tips to family members and friends. In Salman v. United States, the Court unanimously held that...more

The Supreme Court - December, 2016 #2

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in three cases today: Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-777: A jury found that smartphones manufactured by petitioner Samsung infringed respondent Apple...more

The Supreme Court Reaffirms Dirks In Salman

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court handed down its first decision on insider trading in years, affirming the conviction of Bassam Salman for insider trading in violation of Exchange Act Section 10(b). Salman v. United States, No. 15-628...more

Supreme Court Confirms Broad Reach of Insider Trading Liability

by Ropes & Gray LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Salman v. United States, clarifying the personal benefit standard of insider trading under the federal securities laws. In resolving what it called a “narrow” issue, the Court...more

Employee Benefits Developments - October 2016

by Hodgson Russ LLP on

The Employee Benefits practice group is pleased to present the Benefits Developments Newsletter for the month of October, 2016. 2017 Benefits Limits Announced - The Internal Revenue Service and Social Security...more

Insider Trading Before the Supreme Court: Dirks and Salman, Part II

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In Part I of this occasional series, the background to U.S. v. Salman and the arguments advanced by the Petitioner-defendant in his opening brief before the Supreme Court were examined. In this segment of the series, the...more

144 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 6
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.