News & Analysis as of

Motion to Dismiss Rules of Civil Procedure

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Ruling Clarifies Section 101 Procedures

WilmerHale on

Courts have long interpreted Title 35 of the U.S. Code, Section 101, to bar patenting abstract ideas, laws of nature or natural phenomena. But until six years ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Washington County Landfill/Expansion: Administrative Law Judge Addresses Motions to Dismiss Petitioners' Request for Adjudicatory...

As previously noted in April 18th and April 19th blog posts, the Mayor of Tontitown and certain individuals filed separate (two) Requests for Adjudicatory Hearing and Commission Review (collectively “Petitions”) before the...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Arkansas Department of Energy & Environment - Division of Environmental Quality/Emergency Order Addressing Pope County Fueling...

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Charles Moulton addressed in an August 16th Amended Recommended Decision (“ARD”) an issue arising out of the administrative litigation associated with Mena Short Stop, LLC (“Mena Short Stop”)....more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Delaware Court Denies Motion to Dismiss NPE’s Direct Infringement Claims Despite Sparse Allegations

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The number of Non-Practicing Entities (NPE) cases has increased in Delaware by almost 10% over the last year. If you or a client finds yourself the target of an NPE patent litigation suit, the next question is usually what...more

Winstead PC

Court Discusses De Facto Trustee Status In Texas

Winstead PC on

In Bird v. Carl C. Anderson, a trust beneficiary sued a defendant for usurping a trustee’s role and breaching fiduciary duties as a de facto trustee. No. 03-21-00140-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 5036 (Tex. App.—Austin June 24,...more

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP

West Virginia Supreme Court Rejects Federal “Plausible On Its Face” Standard For Motions to Dismiss Under State Counterpart of...

The Rules of Civil Procedure adopted by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals are derived to a large extent from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  In fact, many of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure track...more

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP

Second Circuit Slaps Down Anti-SLAPP Motions As Barred In Federal Court

In a striking decision issued on July 15, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that motions to dismiss based on state Anti-SLAPP statutes, which require that plaintiffs satisfy a high standard of proof...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

‘Notice Pleading’ Passes the Smell Test in Noxious Odor Matter

Emphasizing the concept of “notice pleading” under Mass. R. Civ. P. 8, Judge Salinger recently denied a gelatin factory’s motion to dismiss. In Baranofsky v. Rousselot Peabody, Inc., a proposed class of neighboring City of...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses Pleading ‘With Particularity’ Under Rule 23.1

Rule 23.1 of the Delaware Court of Chancery Rules requires a plaintiff asserting a shareholder derivative action to plead “with particularity the efforts, if any, made by the plaintiff to obtain the action the plaintiff...more

Carlton Fields

Without Jurisdiction or Authority to Review, California Appellate Court Dismisses Appeal of Trial Court’s Statement of Decision

Carlton Fields on

Finding that a California trial court’s statement of decision was not a judgment or appealable order, the California Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, having no jurisdiction or authority to review it....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Skilled Lawyering Saves Defendant from Default Judgment in Products Liability Lawsuit

In a products liability lawsuit against the manufacturer and seller, a plaintiff asserted claims of strict products liability, breach of warranty, negligence, gross negligence, and consumer fraud. One defendant filed a...more

White and Williams LLP

“Wait! Do You Have All Your Ducks in a Row?” Filing of a Certificate of Merit in Conjunction With a Complaint

White and Williams LLP on

In Barrett v. Berry Contr. L.P., No. 13-18-00498-CV, 2019 Tex. LEXIS 8811, the Thirteenth District Court of Appeals of Texas considered, among other things, the procedural timing requirements of filing a certificate of merit...more

Brooks Pierce

Who Knew That A Motion To Transfer Venue Could Be So Complicated?

Brooks Pierce on

North Carolina cases that are filed in an "improper county" can be transferred to the "proper county" if the "defendant, before the time of answering expires, demands in writing that the trial be conducted in the proper...more

Melito & Adolfsen

Common Misunderstandings about “The One Motion Rule” In New York Practice

Melito & Adolfsen on

In discussing the timing of a motion for summary judgment, lawyers will often refer to “the one motion rule.” There is no such rule as to summary judgment. “The one motion rule” is a statutory rule that applies only to...more

Snell & Wilmer

Colorado Eschews “No Set of Facts” and Embraces the Federal Iqbal/Twombly Pleading Standard in Warne v. Hall

Snell & Wilmer on

In 2007, the United States Supreme Court applied a new, stricter standard to motions to dismiss, and extended and further explained that standard in 2009. While some state courts have followed suit, others have reaffirmed the...more

Brooks Pierce

A Happy Dance For Plaintiffs Who Moot A Motion To Dismiss By Moving To Amend Their Complaint

Brooks Pierce on

Maybe you've been in this situation before. You've moved to dismiss a complaint, have fully briefed your motion, and the defendant dances in on the day of the hearing on your motion and amends his complaint. And the...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Inapplicability of the "One Year" Limitations Tolling Period of the N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure

Womble Bond Dickinson on

In Murphy v. Hinton, No. COA14-1230 (July 7, 2015), the North Carolina Court of Appeals determined that a complaint dismissed voluntarily cannot benefit from the "one-year refiling" period pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a Prevalence and Practicality Two Years Later

McGuireWoods LLP on

For many years, a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) has provided an effective tool for dismissing baseless claims early in the litigation process. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure did...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide