News & Analysis as of

OK Supreme Court

McAfee & Taft

Oklahoma Supreme Court calls into question indemnity provisions in oilfield service contracts

McAfee & Taft on

On May 21, 2024, the Oklahoma Supreme Court issued an opinion in Knox v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co., 2024 OK 37, holding that an employer cannot contractually create or assume liability where liability is based on the same...more

McAfee & Taft

Gavel to Gavel: Show your math — Protecting attorney fee awards

McAfee & Taft on

Remember when your math teacher told you to show your work even if you had the correct answer? Now, that exact requirement unequivocally applies to attorney fee awards in Oklahoma. In a recent decision, the Oklahoma Supreme...more

McAfee & Taft

Attorney fee awards in Oklahoma: More than just a number

McAfee & Taft on

Whether you’re considering a move for—or defending against—an attorney fee award, it’s crucial to be aware of the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fleig v. Landmark Constr. Grp., 2024 OK 25. In Fleig, the Supreme...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Production Tax Credits/Wind Power Facility: Oklahoma Supreme Court Addresses Applicability of Ad Valorem Taxation

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma (“Court”) addressed in an October 18th Opinion an issue arising out of two Oklahoma County Assessors’ valuation of a wind farm for ad valorem tax assessment purposes. See Kingfisher Wind, LLC v....more

Cozen O'Connor

Oklahoma Supreme Court Rejects “Loss of Use” Argument, Nixes COVID-19 Business Interruption Suit

Cozen O'Connor on

There is a clear nationwide trend of federal courts disposing of COVID-19 business interruption suits. Insureds are not clearing their initial burden to establish direct physical loss or damage to property, or they are...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - July 2022

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Our July Insurance Update is here. This is what we discuss. “Hoosier” daddy? When a Little Daddy’s bouncer chased a drunk patron from Big Daddy’s parking lot, who knew it would lead to the Indiana Supreme Court...more

Cozen O'Connor

Waste Water and Ambiguities: Oklahoma Supreme Court Affirms that Carrier Must Defend Oil and Gas Company in Property Damage Suit

Cozen O'Connor on

In Crown Energy Co. v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., Case No. 116989, 2022 WL 2128667 (Okla. June 14, 2022), the Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that seismic activity caused by water waste disposal wells in oil and gas operations...more

McAfee & Taft

Home Depot employee’s wrongful discharge claim hammered

McAfee & Taft on

Under some circumstances, Oklahoma law recognizes that terminated employees may pursue a public policy wrongful discharge claim against a former employer. These claims allow a narrow exception to the employment at-will status...more

Hicks Johnson

Public Nuisance Claim Loses Traction in Oklahoma Opioid Case; Ohio, California Cases Move Forward

Hicks Johnson on

The past year saw several attempts to apply new applications of the public nuisance doctrine to the opioid crisis. While in the past, public nuisance claims typically sought recovery for damages in connection with land use in...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Oklahoma Supreme Court Sets Aside $465 Million Public Nuisance Opioid Verdict

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On November 9, 2021, the Oklahoma Supreme Court set aside a $465 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in State ex rel. Hunter v. Johnson & Johnson, 2021 OK 54. In 2017, the State of Oklahoma sued three opioid...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Financial Daily Dose 11.10.2021 | Top Story: Google Loses Appeal of EU’s $2.8B Antitrust Fine

Robins Kaplan LLP on

In a blow to Google and the rest of Big Tech, an EU appeals court has refused to “overturn a landmark antitrust ruling by European regulators” from 2017 over Google’s alleged “preferential treatment to its own...more

Hicks Johnson

Are Public Nuisance Claims the Next Super Torts?

Hicks Johnson on

Public nuisance claims have long been understood to rest on “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.” Typically, litigation sought recovery for damages in connection with (among other...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - January 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Courts ended 2020 with a flurry of insurance decisions. Our January 2021 Update highlights some of these decisions, including several by state supreme courts. We begin with a new twist on pandemic-related claims. ...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

Dealership's Finance Manager Had Duty to Inform Buyer of Inconspicuous Arbitration Clause in Purchase Agreement Due to False...

Hudson Cook, LLP on

The buyer and a dealership signed a purchase agreement containing a dispute resolution clause ("DRC"). The DRC, in the middle of the purchase agreement, was the only provision in red ink, was in a smaller font and called for...more

Carlton Fields

Oklahoma Supreme Court Finds Arbitrator, Not Court, to Determine Fraudulent Inducement Attack on Contract Containing Arbitration...

Carlton Fields on

The plaintiff-appellant filed suit in Oklahoma state court seeking to rescind a contract it entered into with the defendants, claiming the contract was procured by fraud. Citing an arbitration clause in the contract, the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Oklahoma Supreme Court Strikes Down New Distribution Statute as Unconstitutional

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a win for alcohol beverage suppliers, on Wednesday the Oklahoma Supreme Court issued an opinion in The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm’n. In a 5-4 ruling,...more

McAfee & Taft

So… are they married or not? - Gavel to Gavel

McAfee & Taft on

Oklahoma remains one of about only a dozen states that recognize common law marriages. Despite the Legislature’s sporadic attempts to effectively abolish such marriages, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has recently determined in...more

Carlton Fields

Oklahoma Supreme Court Reverses Course: Finds Arbitration Clause Printed on Shingles’ Wrapping Did Not Bind Homeowner to Arbitrate

Carlton Fields on

A third-party contractor installed the defendant’s shingles on the plaintiffs’ roof. Subsequently, the plaintiffs filed suit for damages allegedly caused by the defendant’s faulty shingles and replacement of their roof. The...more

McAfee & Taft

Not So Fast: Oklahoma legislature has final word on where to file workers’ comp-based retaliation claims

McAfee & Taft on

Just days after the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s long-awaited decision in Southon v. Oklahoma Tire Recyclers, LLC, which upheld the exclusive authority of the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Commission to hear and decide workers’...more

McAfee & Taft

Workers’ Comp Commission declared rightful forum for related discrimination and retaliation claims

McAfee & Taft on

On May 21, 2019, the Oklahoma Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision that is good news for employers and, at least for now, finally makes clear there is only one path for filing workers’ compensation-based...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Oklahoma Supreme Court Quashes Noneconomic Damages Cap for Personal Injury Claims

A divided Oklahoma Supreme Court recently invalidated the $350,000 noneconomic damages cap on pain and suffering in personal injury lawsuits. In Beason v. I.E. Miller Services, Inc., the court held that the statutory damages...more

White and Williams LLP

Top Developments – February 2017

White and Williams LLP on

JP Energy Marketing, LLC v. Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, et al., No. 115285, 2018 Okla. LEXIS 11 (Okla. Feb. 5, 2018) - Oklahoma Supreme Court in a case of first impression authorizes an award of appeal-related...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Challenge to Electric-Drive/Hybrid-Drive Vehicle Fee: Supreme Court of Oklahoma Opinion

The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma (“Court”) issued an October 24th opinion addressing a challenge filed by the Sierra Club to Oklahoma legislation which created the Motor Fuels Tax Fee (“H.B. 1449 [ Legislation]”)...more

McAfee & Taft

Obtaining informed consent now requires full disclosure of certain surgical assistants

McAfee & Taft on

In a previous article titled “Oklahoma Supreme Court broadens scope of state’s informed consent law,” we reported on the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s expansion of the state’s informed consent law as it relates to the requirements...more

Cozen O'Connor

Three Western Courts Hold Carbon Monoxide Is a Pollutant, But Washington Makes New Anti-Insurer Rules

Cozen O'Connor on

Washington - On April 27, 2017, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that carbon monoxide discharged from a hot water heater was a pollutant “acting as a pollutant” and within the absolute pollution exclusion of the home...more

32 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide