News & Analysis as of

Original Jurisdiction

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 21, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions today: United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915: This Second Amendment case addresses the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which makes it a crime for an...more

Mintz

Republican AGs Seek Intervention of U.S. Supreme Court to Block Climate Change Lawsuits filed by Blue States Against Fossil Fuel...

Mintz on

A coalition of Republican state attorneys-general representing nineteen states (Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides New York v. New Jersey

On April 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in a case of original jurisdiction, New York v. New Jersey, No. 156, Orig., holding the state of New Jersey could unilaterally withdraw from the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

A Good Day for Jersey: SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

Once again, with a substantial backlog of cases—some of them potentially controversial—argued and pending decision, the Court continues to sail in relatively calm waters....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 18, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision: New York v. New Jersey, No. 22O156: This case was heard pursuant to the Court’s original jurisdiction and addressed whether New York could prevent New...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Delaware v. Pennsylvania

On February 28, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Delaware v. Pennsylvania, No. 145, Orig., holding that certain instruments offered by MoneyGram are similar to money orders and are therefore covered...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - February 28, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions: Bittner v. United States, No. 21-1195: This case concerns the Bank Secrecy Act’s requirement that certain individuals file an annual report about their...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

States collide on unclaimed property at the Supreme Court

​​​​​​​The US Supreme Court heard arguments on October 3, 2022 on an unclaimed property case for the first time since the early 1990s. The case, Delaware v. Pennsylvania, is a state-versus-state dispute between Delaware and...more

Woods Rogers

What To Expect From The Virginia Supreme Court Regarding Certified Questions Of Law

Woods Rogers on

While the vast majority of cases heard by the Supreme Court of Virginia are to review rulings from lower Virginia courts, occasionally the Supreme Court will be called upon to answer “certified questions” on a point of...more

Woods Rogers

Appellate Practice: Original Jurisdiction Of Virginia Appellate Courts

Woods Rogers on

As discussed in our recent article, the Virginia General Assembly voted to allow most criminal defendants and civil litigants to have an appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals of Virginia starting on January 1, 2022. This...more

K&L Gates LLP

When Water Rights Evaporate

K&L Gates LLP on

In August 2020, we outlined four notable interstate water rights cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that are likely to change how states use and treat water as a resource. One of those cases, Texas v. New Mexico, addresses...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Texas v. New Mexico

On December 14, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Texas v. New Mexico, holding that New Mexico was entitled to delivery credit under the Pecos River Compact for water stored at the request of Texas that evaporated during...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

[Webinar] Environmental Permitting Appeals and Pipeline Construction: Are the circuit courts the new environmental review courts?...

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Bricker attorneys Frank Merrill and Christine Rideout Schirra will be presenting 'Environmental Permitting Appeals and Pipeline Construction: Are the circuit courts the new environmental review courts?' for the Institute of...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Florida v. Georgia/Interstate Water Dispute: U.S. Supreme Court Special Master Report

A United States Supreme Court (“Court”) Special Master (“Special Master”) issued a December 11th Report in the interstate water dispute between the states of Florida and Georgia. See State of Florida v. State of Georgia, No....more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending September 27, 2019

Carlton Fields on

Real Property Update - Construction Lien: a delinquency charge of 1.5 percent found in materialman's contract with general contractor is not a finance charge recoverable under the materialman lien statute, Florida Statutes...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Arizona Tests The Nature Of The Supreme Court’s Original Jurisdiction

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Last week, the State of Arizona made an interesting litigation decision. As part of the ongoing litigation over the opioid crisis, Arizona filed a complaint against Purdue Pharmaceuticals and its owners, the Sackler...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Hears Argument on CAFA Removal

Goodwin on

On January 15, 2019, the Court heard arguments in Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471, and is now set to answer the question of whether the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA)—which permits removal by “any defendant”...more

A&O Shearman

Supreme Court Argument On Third-party Counterclaim Defendant Removal

A&O Shearman on

On January 15, 2019, the Supreme Court heard argument on an appeal from a unanimous decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit holding that a third-party defendant against whom class action counter-claims...more

K&L Gates LLP

SCOTUS Ruling Gives Florida Chance to Prevail in Water War Against Georgia

K&L Gates LLP on

We previously issued an alert analyzing two interstate water compact disputes before the U.S. Supreme Court (“SCOTUS” or the “Court”): Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado and Florida v. Georgia. On June 27, the Court rejected...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Florida v. Georgia: U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Interstate Water Dispute

The United States Supreme Court (“Court”) issued an opinion today in the interstate water dispute between the states of Florida and Georgia. The Court had previously found that the litigation fit within its original...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 27, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States announced the retirement of Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy: Justice Kennedy, nominated by President Ronald Reagan to the Supreme Court, assumed the bench in 1988. ...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - February 20, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

CNH Industrial N. V. v. Reese, No. 17-515: Based upon its decision in International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. V. Yard-Man, Inc., 716 F.2d 1476 (6th Cir. 1983), the Sixth Circuit...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Eleventh Circuit Confirms Scope of Original Jurisdiction Under Class Action Fairness Act

Holland & Knight LLP on

In Wright Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Corporation, et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit considered whether a district court retains original jurisdiction over state law claims following the dismissal...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Unclaimed Property Disputes Over State Priority Take Center Stage, Head to U.S. Supreme Court and the Third Circuit

Disputes over the unclaimed property priority rules continue to intensify. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted review of a clash involving more than 20 states regarding the right to take custody of official checks. ...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 2016 #8

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in eight cases last week: Bank of America Corp. v. Miami, No. 15-1111; Wells Fargo & Co. v. Miami, 15-1112: (1) Whether the term “aggrieved” in the Fair Housing Act imposes a...more

28 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide