News & Analysis as of

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter › United States Patent and Trademark Office › Software

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a... more +
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a researcher discovers a naturally occurring substance, the substance itself cannot be patented. This issue was examined in a United States Supreme Court case, AMP v. Myriad, in regard to the patentability of human genes.  less -
MoFo Tech

USPTO Guidance: Artificial Intelligence Inventions That Solve A Technical Problem Eligible For Patenting

MoFo Tech on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued guidance regarding patent eligibility with respect to patenting artificial intelligence (AI) inventions. See an overview of the eligibility test applied by the USPTO....more

WilmerHale

USPTO Issues Guidance Update on Subject Matter Eligibility of Artificial Intelligence

WilmerHale on

On July 17, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published guidance regarding the patent subject matter eligibility of claims concerning technology applicable to artificial intelligence (AI)....more

BakerHostetler

USPTO AI Examination Update Provides New Example Cases Analyzing Subject Matter Eligibility Under §101

BakerHostetler on

In a July 16 press release, The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced that it issued a guidance update on “patent subject matter eligibility to address innovation in critical emerging technologies including...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Is Your Blockchain Invention Patentable?

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

Blockchain is becoming central to more FinTech patent portfolios than ever – but it’s harder to obtain protection on blockchain than most other technologies. The US Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. CLS Bank (2014)...more

Holland & Knight LLP

A Bad Day for this Patent Applicant: Travel Itinerary Applications Ineligible Under Section 101

Holland & Knight LLP on

In the case of In re Bongiorno, No. 2020-1835, 2021 WL 1997454, at *4 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2021), patent applicant James Bongiorno appealed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) finding that two of his patent applications...more

Fish & Richardson

Patenting Software: A Case Study in Overcoming Alice (Updated)

Fish & Richardson on

In 2014, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, et al., 573 U.S. 208, which significantly altered the patentability of software, business methods,...more

Knobbe Martens

Trends and Changes in View of the USPTO’s Updated Revised Guidance (Presentation)

Knobbe Martens on

Partner Mauricio Uribe hosted a webinar presenting, "Trends and Changes in View of the USPTO's Updated Revised Guidance." Topics Include: • Summary of the October 2019 Update to the Revised Guidance •...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Ex parte Smith (PTAB 2019)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Software Claims Survive Section 101 Challenge and Are Found to Be Directed to Patent-Eligible Subject Matter - In the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently designated its...more

Knobbe Martens

Big Picture on Software Patent Eligibility: The Forces at Work

Knobbe Martens on

Much of the modern economy is driven by software development. Companies are creating and refining new apps that run on mobile devices, and using machine learning to provide users with personalized user interfaces and...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

USPTO Provides Guidance to Examiners on Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Relating to Patent Eligibility of Software Claims

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP on

Over the past six years, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a series of decisions—Bilski, Mayo, Myriad, and Alice—that have significantly impacted patent eligibility law, particularly in the areas of software and...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp. -- Judge Mayer on the First Amendment

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Decided September 30th, this Federal Circuit case is already making waves. The majority opinion seems to be at tension with the Court's outcome in BASCOM Glob. Internet Servs., Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, but the real...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

September Was a Good Month for Patent Eligibility in the District Courts

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Anecdotally, there seems to be a loosening up regarding the application of § 101 by the District Courts. The 2014 Supreme Court decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l has been referred to as sounding a death knell for...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Of Technical Tools and Problems: Going Beyond the Two-Prong Alice Test

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

It is abundantly clear that the Supreme Court's 2014 Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank decision has significantly changed the patent-eligibility landscape for business methods and some types of software inventions. For instance, in...more

Troutman Pepper

Seeking Shelter From the Patent Eligibility Storm: Does the DTSA Provide Sanctuary?

Troutman Pepper on

For many charged with the development of intellectual property portfolios in the life sciences and software industries, navigating the stormy waters of patent eligibility has recently proven difficult. U.S. Supreme Court and...more

K&L Gates LLP

Abstract Ideas and the USPTO: Examiner Guidance Post Enfish and TLI

K&L Gates LLP on

On May 19, 2016, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a memorandum containing a summary of two recent Federal Circuit decisions along with a directive for how patent examiners should apply the holdings of the...more

BakerHostetler

USPTO Memo re Enfish v. Microsoft

BakerHostetler on

This is an update to my recent article about the Federal Circuit’s decision in Enfish v. Microsoft. In a memo to the Patent Examining Corps dated May 19, 2016, Deputy Commissioner Robert Bahr said that the Enfish...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Federal Circuit Holds District Court Abstractness Analysis Too Abstract for Alice under 35 USC § 101

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Clients in the software space now have stronger arguments for subject matter eligibility, following the Federal Circuit decision in Enfish LLC v. Microsoft Corp. (May 12, 2016). The decision also touches on novelty,...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

The Government Whittles Away at Life Sciences Patents

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

The current U.S. Supreme Court has been noted for its hostility to patent holders in general, but the Supreme Court has been especially hostile to any sort of life sciences or software invention. The Court has attempted to...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Patent Subject Matter Eligibility – Impact on Litigation and Prosecution

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Personalized medicine relies on diagnostic technologies to accurately evaluate a patient’s clinical or genetic signature to guide treatment decisions. Protecting innovation by patenting the diagnostic methods and tools that...more

Burns & Levinson LLP

One Year After Alice

Burns & Levinson LLP on

It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. Pty, Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014). Although a number of software patents have been invalidated for reciting...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

USPTO Issues July 2015 Updated Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On July 30, 2015, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued updated guidance regarding subject matter eligibility analysis to address six major themes from comments received in response to the 2014 Interim...more

Fenwick & West LLP

The One Year Anniversary: The Aftermath of #AliceStorm

Fenwick & West LLP on

It's been one year since the Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank. On its face the opinion was relatively conservative, cautioning courts to "tread carefully" before invalidating patents, and emphasizing that...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Interim Guidance Status Check

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

As of Tuesday, June 16th, we have been living with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's "2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility" ("Guidance") for six months. Although the USPTO subsequently issued some...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Conventional Use of Computer Not Enough to Overcome Alice - Westlake Services, LLC v. Credit Acceptance Corp.; Regions Financial...

McDermott Will & Emery on

In two separate decisions involving an § 101 analysis of subject-matter eligibility of business methods patents (CBMs), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found that the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Specific Application Will Not Avoid Ineligibility Unless Required by the Claims - Int’l Securities Exchange LLC v. Chicago Board...

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing the patent eligibility of claims from two challenged covered business method patents (CBMs), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found the challenged claims to be...more

51 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide