News & Analysis as of

Pharmaceutical Industry Infringement Pharmaceutical Patents

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada dismisses Apotex and Pharmascience’s applications for leave to appeal paliperidone inducing infringement...

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed two decisions relating to paliperidone palmitate (Janssen’s INVEGA SUSTENNA), finding in a summary trial that each of Pharmascience and Apotex would induce...more

Knobbe Martens

Going down With the Ship: Non-infringing Indications Are Barred When Listed in the Same ANDA as Infringing Indications

Knobbe Martens on

SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. v. NORWICH PHARMACEUTICALS., INC. Before Lourie, Chen, and Cunningham.  Appeal from the District of Delaware Summary: The Federal Circuit ruled that an ANDA listing an infringing indication cannot...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Addresses Scope of Medical Device and Drug Infringement Safe Harbor

WilmerHale on

On March 25, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., addressing whether the act of importing two heart valve systems for a medical conference was within the...more

King & Spalding

ITC Section 337 Update - June 2015 #2

King & Spalding on

Second 100-Day ID Finds Complainant Has Standing In 949 Investigation – As mentioned in prior coverage, on March 12, 2015, the Commission issued a Notice of Investigation in Certain Audio Processing Hardware and Software,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

G.D. Searle LLC v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Over seven years ago, the Federal Circuit delivered a mixed ruling against Pfizer in litigation against Teva) relating to the pain medication Celebrex® (celocoxib) (where "celocoxib" is...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Court Report - February 2015 #4

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. et al. v. Pfizer, Inc. 2:15-cv-01283; filed February 18, 2015 in the District...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2013)

A claim term that can have different meanings or values depending on the method used to measure it renders the claim indefinite because it is impossible for a potential infringer to discern the boundaries of the claim. This...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Court Report -- June 02, 2013

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. et al. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. 3:13-cv-02416; filed May 29, 2013 in the Northern District...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Court Report -- April 07, 2013

In This Issue: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. et al. v. Noven Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.; Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P. et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. et al.; Taro Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc....more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide