News & Analysis as of

Retirement Plan › Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) › Marriage

Freeman Law

Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Demystified | What divorcing spouses should know.

Freeman Law on

Divorce and retirement plans - Many domestic proceedings involve the division of retirement assets. With more than 80 million workers in the U.S. being covered by an employer-provided retirement plan, retirement savings...more

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

The beneficiary form and the need for no drama

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on

As a plan sponsor, you need to make sure that participant beneficiary forms are up to date. It’s not enough that you make sure that every participant has filled one out, you also have to make sure that they’re updated. Family...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Non-Qualified Retirement Plans & Divorce: You May be Able to Honor DROs, But Should You?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

You probably already know that employers are required to honor qualified domestic relations orders (commonly referred to as “QDROs”) regarding the division of qualified retirement plan benefits (such as 401(k) balances) when...more

Lewitt Hackman

Accidental Disinheritance: Update Wills, Estate Plans Annually

Lewitt Hackman on

So you have an estate plan? Good for you. You funded it? Even better. But have you updated it and your will in the last year? If you haven’t, your loved ones or favorite charities may be in for an unpleasant surprise. Your...more

Fenwick & West LLP

The Supreme Court’s DOMA Decision: What Does it Mean for Employee Benefit Plans?

Fenwick & West LLP on

On June 26, 2013, in U.S. v. Windsor, the United States Supreme Court struck down the portion of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) that defined marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman. This decision will...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Ramifications of the Overturning of DOMA on Employee Benefit Plans

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court overturned Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), which required the federal government to deny married same-sex couples the rights and benefits provided to...more

Polsinelli

What the Supreme Court's Defense Of Marriage Act Ruling Means For Employers

Polsinelli on

On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), which barred federal recognition of same-sex marriages. ...more

Dechert LLP

Supreme Court DOMA Decision Is Far-Reaching, but Leaves Many Unanswered Questions for Employers

Dechert LLP on

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Windsor, that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) was “unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is...more

Littler

Same-Sex Marriages and Benefit Plans After Windsor

Littler on

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Windsor v. United States, No. 12-307. The Court ruled (in a 5-4 decision) that the section of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that required federal...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Supreme Court Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage: Impact on Employee Benefits

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

The United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision on June 26, 2013 in United States v. Windsor that struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional has far reaching implications for employee...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide